Recent Topics
Amsoil and light weight oil
by Bullwinkle007
02/22/18 08:38 AM
What type of Dog Breeds do you own?
by pengem
02/22/18 08:30 AM
Calling AR guys - AR 10 Rear Sight options
by stockrex
02/22/18 08:00 AM
Alexa for seniors
by callbay
02/22/18 07:05 AM
229.51
by RogerBacon
02/22/18 06:25 AM
One way to get the rust off under your vehicle...
by rollinpete
02/22/18 04:04 AM
Loud hum noise from front brakes
by Jimmy9190
02/21/18 10:47 PM
Rat: Trap or Poison
by WhyMe
02/21/18 10:27 PM
STIHL Hp ultra fail??? Or my fault???
by Matt2stroke
02/21/18 09:42 PM
Wrestling pretzel hold. Ouch!
by callbay
02/21/18 09:41 PM
Serpentine Belt noise
by Tdbo
02/21/18 09:31 PM
Coolant Leak
by Ducked
02/21/18 09:13 PM
Does lots of starts let gas get in oil?
by tc1446
02/21/18 08:44 PM
Avalanche front and rear diff change.
by spasm3
02/21/18 08:40 PM
Abuse proof rental home flooring
by Oldtom
02/21/18 08:17 PM
Low Noise Oil
by Ducked
02/21/18 07:55 PM
2017 Dodge charger review
by gabriel9766
02/21/18 07:51 PM
Dry reusable air filters?
by WillB
02/21/18 07:42 PM
Batteries @ Menards
by Tdbo
02/21/18 07:29 PM
Blotter Spot Test
by Emanuel
02/21/18 07:22 PM
Newest Members
WiseOne, ryan6548, pjmbull, 92zx, Ara
64253 Registered Users
Who's Online
80 registered (BAJA_05, 4WD, A_Harman, 2004tdigls, 2015_PSD, Andrei, 6 invisible), 1435 Guests and 102 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
64253 Members
65 Forums
278525 Topics
4649128 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#4299547 - 01/11/17 11:56 AM Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns
Ramblejam Offline


Registered: 11/05/13
Posts: 3206
Loc: Kentucky
"According to Framís Technical Training Manager Jay Buckley, dirt and foreign material measuring smaller than 10 microns will be small enough to be carried in suspension in the oil and will pass through even tight bearing clearances. Material larger than 20 microns is generally considered too large to pass through tight bearing clearances although with performance engines with main bearing clearances of 0.0030-inch, this is certainly possible. But generally speaking, foreign material in the range between 10 and 20 microns will potentially do the most engine damage over time. So a filter that can efficiently filter within this range would offer distinct advantages and certainly reduce engine wear."

http://www.onallcylinders.com/2015/05/29...our-oil-filter/

ďFram Ultra Guard filter, it is 99 percent efficient at 20 microns. At 10 microns itís 94 percent efficient

Very impressive!

For some comparison/context, here's what Royal Purple says about their filters:

99 percent @ 25 microns/80 percent @ 10 microns

Top
#4299550 - 01/11/17 11:58 AM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Ramblejam]
Doublehaul Offline


Registered: 05/19/14
Posts: 409
Loc: Ice Box of the Nation
Best filters money can buy IMHO
_________________________
2016 F-350 XLT 4x4 6.2l V8 4.30 SRW
Boss DXT Stainless V-Plow

Valvoline VWB 5w30
Fram Ultra XG-2

Top
#4299575 - 01/11/17 12:22 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Ramblejam]
901Memphis Offline


Registered: 08/14/10
Posts: 12765
Loc: Northern Kentucky
Interesting I've never asked about this before but I've been told they're 80% @ 5 microns by Motorking which is the most impressive spec if you ask me.
_________________________
2002 Buick Century 130k - Built 4T65e(Maxlife) - Edge 0w40 + Fram XG3980
1998 Nissan Altima 337k - 5MT - M1 HM 5w30/Fram Ultra XG7317+MOS+ATP 205

Top
#4299595 - 01/11/17 12:47 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Ramblejam]
beast3300 Offline


Registered: 12/24/09
Posts: 3162
Loc: Ohio
Very impressive indeed!
_________________________
'03 Regal GS L67: PPHM 5w30/FU3980

'99 Grand Prix L36: R.I.P.

'07 LaCrosse L26: QS Dexos blend 5w30/TG3387A

ASE L1 MT


Top
#4299609 - 01/11/17 01:08 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Ramblejam]
bbhero Offline


Registered: 03/20/15
Posts: 4062
Loc: Virginia
The Fram Ultra is an example of the aftermarket product being far better than the OEM part. The OEM filters don't usually offer the same efficiency. One thing I would say is that the Royal Purple filter is not anywhere near a "poor performing" filter by any measure. In fact it is quite a bit better than the OEM filter in terms of efficiency. IF someone has a oil filter that is in a position where it could be exposed to damage from debris coming up from the road or say a gravel road the Royal Purple is "better" than the Fram Ultra. The can thickness/strength of the RP is the best available on the market.
_________________________
Nissan Altima 3.5 Coupe
Federated Auto Full Synthetic 5w30 Fram 7317
"Treat your family like your friends and treat your friends like your family."

Top
#4299615 - 01/11/17 01:12 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Ramblejam]
larryinnewyork Offline


Registered: 02/10/12
Posts: 838
Loc: One Step Beyond
If someone doesn't already know;
25.4 Microns equals .001 Inch.

Not to change the subject, but
that's kinda why I like having a Magnet stuck to the outside of my Oil Filter

Top
#4299620 - 01/11/17 01:14 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: bbhero]
kschachn Online   content


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 8873
Loc: Upper Midwest
Originally Posted By: bbhero
The Fram Ultra is an example of the aftermarket product being far better than the OEM part. The OEM filters don't usually offer the same efficiency. One thing I would say is that the Royal Purple filter is not anywhere near a "poor performing" filter by any measure. In fact it is quite a bit better than the OEM filter in terms of efficiency. IF someone has a oil filter that is in a position where it could be exposed to damage from debris coming up from the road or say a gravel road the Royal Purple is "better" than the Fram Ultra. The can thickness/strength of the RP is the best available on the market.


As for making comparisons to OEM filters, where have you seen data for those? I mean other than the one Amsoil chart that is always rolled out. As far as I know I've never seen such data published by the OEM. Have you?
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 224K
1996 Honda Accord, 251K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 387K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 264K

Top
#4299649 - 01/11/17 01:38 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Ramblejam]
Doublehaul Offline


Registered: 05/19/14
Posts: 409
Loc: Ice Box of the Nation
Many of the OEM filters are re-branded known aftermarket filters with published figures ifiak
_________________________
2016 F-350 XLT 4x4 6.2l V8 4.30 SRW
Boss DXT Stainless V-Plow

Valvoline VWB 5w30
Fram Ultra XG-2

Top
#4299656 - 01/11/17 01:43 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Ramblejam]
Linctex Offline


Registered: 12/31/16
Posts: 4741
Loc: Waco, TX
Originally Posted By: Ramblejam
ďFram Ultra Guard filter, it is 99 percent efficient at 20 microns. At 10 microns itís 94 percent efficient.Ē


Has this been verified by a lab anywhere, or just claimed?
_________________________
"The evidence demands a verdict".
(Re:VOA)"it's nearly impossible to actually know the particular additives that are in there at what concentrations."

Top
#4299657 - 01/11/17 01:44 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Doublehaul]
kschachn Online   content


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 8873
Loc: Upper Midwest
Originally Posted By: Doublehaul
Many of the OEM filters are re-branded known aftermarket filters with published figures ifiak


Really? Which ones in particular? I know that such a cross-reference does not apply to any of the ones I use (Toyota, Honda OEM and BMW Hengst).
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 224K
1996 Honda Accord, 251K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 387K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 264K

Top
#4299673 - 01/11/17 01:55 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: kschachn]
bbhero Offline


Registered: 03/20/15
Posts: 4062
Loc: Virginia
If you choose not to believe the test results from the "independent" study by Amsoil or anyone one else for that matter what does it really matter?? Nothing. No point in any discussion here.
_________________________
Nissan Altima 3.5 Coupe
Federated Auto Full Synthetic 5w30 Fram 7317
"Treat your family like your friends and treat your friends like your family."

Top
#4299679 - 01/11/17 02:04 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: bbhero]
kschachn Online   content


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 8873
Loc: Upper Midwest
Originally Posted By: bbhero
If you choose not to believe the test results from the "independent" study by Amsoil or anyone one else for that matter what does it really matter?? Nothing. No point in any discussion here.


Anyone else? That's the issue, there is no "anyone else" other than the one old Amsoil chart. Does that even apply to current OEM filters? Without data being provided by the manufacturer I don't see how comparisons can be made.
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 224K
1996 Honda Accord, 251K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 387K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 264K

Top
#4299686 - 01/11/17 02:07 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: kschachn]
bbhero Offline


Registered: 03/20/15
Posts: 4062
Loc: Virginia
Having stated that.... The OEM filters are not terrible, bad, garbage, will cause the car to blow up in 150k miles, will not cause ED, diarrhea, loss of hair, low T, high blood pressure, changes in behavior, changes in mood etc.
They are fine. They are not has efficient as the aftermarket offerings on average. That doesn't mean that they will be a bad option at all. Which does bring into question into effiency and how much is just overkill? Maybe just maybe a OEM filter that's say 80% at 20 microns is actually just fine. And that anything above that effiency of the OEM filter is just statistical noise.
_________________________
Nissan Altima 3.5 Coupe
Federated Auto Full Synthetic 5w30 Fram 7317
"Treat your family like your friends and treat your friends like your family."

Top
#4299692 - 01/11/17 02:16 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: kschachn]
bbhero Offline


Registered: 03/20/15
Posts: 4062
Loc: Virginia
I have seen different efficiency numbers for OEM filters over time but I am not interested in trying to track any of that down. My last post is what I think about the rest of it.... Pretty self explanatory. For the record.... I like OEM parts. I actually went to the Nissan dealership to buy my serpentine belt. Why? The original belt was still rolling good at 166k miles. Pretty doggone strong performance. I will need to replace my right side CV axle in awhile. I will definitely get the OEM Nissan CV axle. Expensive at $600. But well worth it compared to the aftermarket offerings.


Edited by bbhero (01/11/17 02:17 PM)
_________________________
Nissan Altima 3.5 Coupe
Federated Auto Full Synthetic 5w30 Fram 7317
"Treat your family like your friends and treat your friends like your family."

Top
#4299713 - 01/11/17 02:49 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: bbhero]
Ohle_Manezzini Offline


Registered: 07/05/16
Posts: 666
Loc: Pindorama
Originally Posted By: bbhero
Having stated that.... The OEM filters are not terrible, bad, garbage, will cause the car to blow up in 150k miles, will not cause ED, diarrhea, loss of hair, low T, high blood pressure, changes in behavior, changes in mood etc.
They are fine. They are not has efficient as the aftermarket offerings on average. That doesn't mean that they will be a bad option at all. Which does bring into question into effiency and how much is just overkill? Maybe just maybe a OEM filter that's say 80% at 20 microns is actually just fine. And that anything above that effiency of the OEM filter is just statistical noise.


OEM are better IMO since the more the efficiency of the filter, it get more bypass burst at high pressure differential, specially for colder short trippers and spirited drivers. At bypass the efficiency fall down to the floor, circulating lots of dirt.

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >