Recent Topics
Mobil 1 5W30-HM 5,011 mi, 1999 Ford Escort
by WA1DH
06/24/18 08:45 PM
what happened to merk
by ernied
06/24/18 08:34 PM
Schaeffer's oil reviews on Amazon
by zfasts03
06/24/18 07:41 PM
Decent MP3 player
by Ed_T
06/24/18 07:08 PM
Letgo
by Donald
06/24/18 06:52 PM
Tire buying advice
by supton
06/24/18 06:23 PM
Two versions of M1 5w30 ESP now?
by Patman
06/24/18 06:21 PM
No older cars in New York State?
by Oldtom
06/24/18 06:19 PM
2009 Taurus strut mount noise
by terry274
06/24/18 04:38 PM
A3/B3 vs A3/B4, big difference or irrelevant?
by FordCapriDriver
06/24/18 03:36 PM
2003 Honda power steering problem
by hogpops
06/24/18 03:29 PM
Public Service Announcement: Flush Your HW Heater
by gathermewool
06/24/18 03:25 PM
Fellow 2AZ-FE toyota owners: what oil are you usin
by car51
06/24/18 03:21 PM
Castrol 0W40 vs 5W40??
by Realfine69
06/24/18 03:02 PM
Paint impurities on a new car
by Quattro Pete
06/24/18 02:49 PM
2014 Ram wheel FIT on a 2005 Ram?
by SumpChump
06/24/18 02:41 PM
Do people buy from telemarketers?
by Chris142
06/24/18 02:06 PM
TGMO 0W20, 8100km/5mo, 2013 Lexus GS350AWD 118K KM
by David_Corbett
06/24/18 01:54 PM
Sonoma Raceway
by Warstud
06/24/18 01:51 PM
Zipcode error
by aquariuscsm
06/24/18 01:36 PM
Newest Members
crrider, EdDmax, 2018matto, Lancruza, IanSampson
65312 Registered Users
Who's Online
111 registered (2015_PSD, 2009Edge, 69Torino, 87sammy, 1nighttrain, 92saturnsl2, 7 invisible), 1470 Guests and 73 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
65312 Members
67 Forums
285939 Topics
4771719 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#4299547 - 01/11/17 11:56 AM Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns
Ramblejam Offline


Registered: 11/05/13
Posts: 3210
Loc: Kentucky
"According to Framís Technical Training Manager Jay Buckley, dirt and foreign material measuring smaller than 10 microns will be small enough to be carried in suspension in the oil and will pass through even tight bearing clearances. Material larger than 20 microns is generally considered too large to pass through tight bearing clearances although with performance engines with main bearing clearances of 0.0030-inch, this is certainly possible. But generally speaking, foreign material in the range between 10 and 20 microns will potentially do the most engine damage over time. So a filter that can efficiently filter within this range would offer distinct advantages and certainly reduce engine wear."

http://www.onallcylinders.com/2015/05/29...our-oil-filter/

ďFram Ultra Guard filter, it is 99 percent efficient at 20 microns. At 10 microns itís 94 percent efficient

Very impressive!

For some comparison/context, here's what Royal Purple says about their filters:

99 percent @ 25 microns/80 percent @ 10 microns

Top
#4299550 - 01/11/17 11:58 AM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Ramblejam]
Doublehaul Offline


Registered: 05/19/14
Posts: 409
Loc: Ice Box of the Nation
Best filters money can buy IMHO
_________________________
2016 F-350 XLT 4x4 6.2l V8 4.30 SRW
Boss DXT Stainless V-Plow

Valvoline VWB 5w30
Fram Ultra XG-2

Top
#4299575 - 01/11/17 12:22 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Ramblejam]
901Memphis Offline


Registered: 08/14/10
Posts: 12893
Loc: Northern Kentucky
Interesting I've never asked about this before but I've been told they're 80% @ 5 microns by Motorking which is the most impressive spec if you ask me.
_________________________
2012 Chevy Cruze LT 1.4T - 50k
2002 Buick Century 130k - Built 4T65e(Maxlife) - Edge 0w40 + Fram XG3980

Top
#4299595 - 01/11/17 12:47 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Ramblejam]
beast3300 Offline


Registered: 12/24/09
Posts: 3164
Loc: Ohio
Very impressive indeed!
_________________________
'03 Regal GS L67: PPUP 5w30/FU3980

'99 Grand Prix L36: R.I.P.

'07 LaCrosse L26: QS HM 5w30/TG3387A

ASE L1 MT


Top
#4299609 - 01/11/17 01:08 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Ramblejam]
bbhero Offline


Registered: 03/20/15
Posts: 4632
Loc: Virginia
The Fram Ultra is an example of the aftermarket product being far better than the OEM part. The OEM filters don't usually offer the same efficiency. One thing I would say is that the Royal Purple filter is not anywhere near a "poor performing" filter by any measure. In fact it is quite a bit better than the OEM filter in terms of efficiency. IF someone has a oil filter that is in a position where it could be exposed to damage from debris coming up from the road or say a gravel road the Royal Purple is "better" than the Fram Ultra. The can thickness/strength of the RP is the best available on the market.
_________________________
Nissan Altima 3.5 Coupe Valvoline Advanced Full Synthetic 5w30 Federated Auto 4612ex
"Treat your family like your friends and treat your friends like your family."

Top
#4299615 - 01/11/17 01:12 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Ramblejam]
larryinnewyork Offline


Registered: 02/10/12
Posts: 838
Loc: One Step Beyond
If someone doesn't already know;
25.4 Microns equals .001 Inch.

Not to change the subject, but
that's kinda why I like having a Magnet stuck to the outside of my Oil Filter

Top
#4299620 - 01/11/17 01:14 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: bbhero]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 9420
Loc: Upper Midwest
Originally Posted By: bbhero
The Fram Ultra is an example of the aftermarket product being far better than the OEM part. The OEM filters don't usually offer the same efficiency. One thing I would say is that the Royal Purple filter is not anywhere near a "poor performing" filter by any measure. In fact it is quite a bit better than the OEM filter in terms of efficiency. IF someone has a oil filter that is in a position where it could be exposed to damage from debris coming up from the road or say a gravel road the Royal Purple is "better" than the Fram Ultra. The can thickness/strength of the RP is the best available on the market.


As for making comparisons to OEM filters, where have you seen data for those? I mean other than the one Amsoil chart that is always rolled out. As far as I know I've never seen such data published by the OEM. Have you?
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 227K
1996 Honda Accord, 262K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 394K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 267K

Top
#4299649 - 01/11/17 01:38 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Ramblejam]
Doublehaul Offline


Registered: 05/19/14
Posts: 409
Loc: Ice Box of the Nation
Many of the OEM filters are re-branded known aftermarket filters with published figures ifiak
_________________________
2016 F-350 XLT 4x4 6.2l V8 4.30 SRW
Boss DXT Stainless V-Plow

Valvoline VWB 5w30
Fram Ultra XG-2

Top
#4299656 - 01/11/17 01:43 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Ramblejam]
Linctex Offline


Registered: 12/31/16
Posts: 6178
Loc: Waco, TX
Originally Posted By: Ramblejam
ďFram Ultra Guard filter, it is 99 percent efficient at 20 microns. At 10 microns itís 94 percent efficient.Ē


Has this been verified by a lab anywhere, or just claimed?
_________________________
"The evidence demands a verdict".
(Re:VOA)"it's nearly impossible to actually know the particular additives that are in there at what concentrations."

Top
#4299657 - 01/11/17 01:44 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: Doublehaul]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 9420
Loc: Upper Midwest
Originally Posted By: Doublehaul
Many of the OEM filters are re-branded known aftermarket filters with published figures ifiak


Really? Which ones in particular? I know that such a cross-reference does not apply to any of the ones I use (Toyota, Honda OEM and BMW Hengst).
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 227K
1996 Honda Accord, 262K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 394K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 267K

Top
#4299673 - 01/11/17 01:55 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: kschachn]
bbhero Offline


Registered: 03/20/15
Posts: 4632
Loc: Virginia
If you choose not to believe the test results from the "independent" study by Amsoil or anyone one else for that matter what does it really matter?? Nothing. No point in any discussion here.
_________________________
Nissan Altima 3.5 Coupe Valvoline Advanced Full Synthetic 5w30 Federated Auto 4612ex
"Treat your family like your friends and treat your friends like your family."

Top
#4299679 - 01/11/17 02:04 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: bbhero]
kschachn Offline


Registered: 12/26/05
Posts: 9420
Loc: Upper Midwest
Originally Posted By: bbhero
If you choose not to believe the test results from the "independent" study by Amsoil or anyone one else for that matter what does it really matter?? Nothing. No point in any discussion here.


Anyone else? That's the issue, there is no "anyone else" other than the one old Amsoil chart. Does that even apply to current OEM filters? Without data being provided by the manufacturer I don't see how comparisons can be made.
_________________________
1994 BMW 530i, 227K
1996 Honda Accord, 262K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 394K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 267K

Top
#4299686 - 01/11/17 02:07 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: kschachn]
bbhero Offline


Registered: 03/20/15
Posts: 4632
Loc: Virginia
Having stated that.... The OEM filters are not terrible, bad, garbage, will cause the car to blow up in 150k miles, will not cause ED, diarrhea, loss of hair, low T, high blood pressure, changes in behavior, changes in mood etc.
They are fine. They are not has efficient as the aftermarket offerings on average. That doesn't mean that they will be a bad option at all. Which does bring into question into effiency and how much is just overkill? Maybe just maybe a OEM filter that's say 80% at 20 microns is actually just fine. And that anything above that effiency of the OEM filter is just statistical noise.
_________________________
Nissan Altima 3.5 Coupe Valvoline Advanced Full Synthetic 5w30 Federated Auto 4612ex
"Treat your family like your friends and treat your friends like your family."

Top
#4299692 - 01/11/17 02:16 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: kschachn]
bbhero Offline


Registered: 03/20/15
Posts: 4632
Loc: Virginia
I have seen different efficiency numbers for OEM filters over time but I am not interested in trying to track any of that down. My last post is what I think about the rest of it.... Pretty self explanatory. For the record.... I like OEM parts. I actually went to the Nissan dealership to buy my serpentine belt. Why? The original belt was still rolling good at 166k miles. Pretty doggone strong performance. I will need to replace my right side CV axle in awhile. I will definitely get the OEM Nissan CV axle. Expensive at $600. But well worth it compared to the aftermarket offerings.


Edited by bbhero (01/11/17 02:17 PM)
_________________________
Nissan Altima 3.5 Coupe Valvoline Advanced Full Synthetic 5w30 Federated Auto 4612ex
"Treat your family like your friends and treat your friends like your family."

Top
#4299713 - 01/11/17 02:49 PM Re: Fram Ultra Efficiency @ 10 Microns [Re: bbhero]
Ohle_Manezzini Offline


Registered: 07/05/16
Posts: 666
Loc: Pindorama
Originally Posted By: bbhero
Having stated that.... The OEM filters are not terrible, bad, garbage, will cause the car to blow up in 150k miles, will not cause ED, diarrhea, loss of hair, low T, high blood pressure, changes in behavior, changes in mood etc.
They are fine. They are not has efficient as the aftermarket offerings on average. That doesn't mean that they will be a bad option at all. Which does bring into question into effiency and how much is just overkill? Maybe just maybe a OEM filter that's say 80% at 20 microns is actually just fine. And that anything above that effiency of the OEM filter is just statistical noise.


OEM are better IMO since the more the efficiency of the filter, it get more bypass burst at high pressure differential, specially for colder short trippers and spirited drivers. At bypass the efficiency fall down to the floor, circulating lots of dirt.

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >