Mobil 1 vs. Toyota 0W-20 - 4000 Honda Insight 1.0

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Nov 4, 2016
Messages
476
Location
MN, CA
The three-cylinder engine ran each oil 4000 miles. The Toyota oil appears to have high levels of Moly and calcium, but there's no evidence it provided extra protection.

Code:


TOYOTA MOBIL

3 2 aluminum

0 0 chromium

4 4 iron

2 2 copper

0 0 lead

0 0 tin

109 77 moly

1 1 nickel

1 1 manganese

0 0 silver

0 0 titanium
Code:


TOYOTA MOBIL

1 1 potassium

18 94 boron

5 12 silicon

5 4 sodium

2305 1414 calcium

125 747 magnesium

790 693 phosphorus

906 788 zinc

0 0 barium

4.1 4.5 TBN

2.9 0.8 TAN

TOYOTA MOBIL
 
It appears to me that the M1 controlled the acid better. And although 1ppm may not be significant, by percentage the M1 test shows only 67% of the iron that the TGMO did.
 
Originally Posted By: veryHeavy
The three-cylinder engine ran each oil 4000 miles. The Toyota oil appears to have high levels of Moly and calcium, but there's no evidence it provided extra protection.




That's because molybdenum is primarily a friction reducer, not an anti-wear additive.
 
Originally Posted By: veryHeavy
The three-cylinder engine ran each oil 4000 miles. The Toyota oil appears to have high levels of Moly and calcium, but there's no evidence it provided extra protection.





Because at 4000 miles virtually any oil you dumped in there would have worked the same. Can't judge the winners of a marathon 5 miles in.
 
Originally Posted By: jayg
Originally Posted By: veryHeavy
The three-cylinder engine ran each oil 4000 miles. The Toyota oil appears to have high levels of Moly and calcium, but there's no evidence it provided extra protection.





Because at 4000 miles virtually any oil you dumped in there would have worked the same. Can't judge the winners of a marathon 5 miles in.


Agreed. This is pointless at best.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top