In my Tundra I will often force a downshift on hills. This will force the convertor to lockup and result in lower rpm, believe it or not, than it being unlocked in a higher gear. Win-win in my mind, although I wouldn't be surprised if I am making a bit more wear on the clutches as a result. [Not sure if this was designed in to make the vehicle more smooth in operation, or to save on clutch life at the expense of mpg.]
In my Camry I alternate. Some hills I let it do its thing, some hills I force a downshift. It seems less aggressive on locking up, and since it doesn't use a variable lockup convertor ,I don't worry as much about it wearing out the clutch. It also has a cheaper trans if something does go.
Both vehicles, sometimes I gear down to use engine braking, sometimes not. Lately I've been using the brakes more. As people say, brakes are cheaper than transmissions. Certainly easier to replace. No hills around me which could tax the brakes, so it's mostly OCD on my part. Comes more from a background of driving manuals, where it was a joy to put the engine rpm right where I wanted, and where I could take some pride in a smooth shift--really, it was all done without thought, selecting gears was done out of habit. So, in an automatic, I still have the habit & desire to shift.
Both vehicles, I will often lock out upper gears when in town. No sense shifting up if I know I'm going to slow and make a turn and then get on it.