Originally Posted By: tig1
Originally Posted By: fdcg27
You are the voice of reason in this thread.
You aren't talking hypothesis based upon known differences in energy content nor are you trying to pursue some theoretical gain in performance potential.
You're simply using the known impact of higher ethanol content fuel in your vehicle as you use it to determine what prices of the various blends available to you yield the lowest fuel cost per mile of operation.
Seems sensible to me.
When I owned a 2000 Ford Ranger with the 3.0, I went from 20MPG to about 16. I tried 3-4 tank fulls before giving up on E85.
Excellently put, but isn't Normal gas E10?
Originally Posted By: fdcg27
You are the voice of reason in this thread.
You aren't talking hypothesis based upon known differences in energy content nor are you trying to pursue some theoretical gain in performance potential.
You're simply using the known impact of higher ethanol content fuel in your vehicle as you use it to determine what prices of the various blends available to you yield the lowest fuel cost per mile of operation.
Seems sensible to me.
When I owned a 2000 Ford Ranger with the 3.0, I went from 20MPG to about 16. I tried 3-4 tank fulls before giving up on E85.
Excellently put, but isn't Normal gas E10?