Yeah, I think you're right. GM's OES additive was/is a great product. ZDDP+ (by Rislone) has worked for me in the past. But I agree with userfriendly, modern monogrades are likely good enough all by themselves.
They can't chase OEM certification as they won't make the cold pour point specs. It would be silly of them to even try. But for folks out west and down south in spring, summer and fall, they are great choices.
Marine and general aviation make do on mono-grades just fine. Some of their engine rebuilders specifically state not to use multi's and/or synthetics for the first three oil changes...
And I have come around on the shared sump motorcycle engine thinking. Mono/GL4 or GL5 is the way to go. Something off the Allison list
Absolutely nothing to shear down at all. The Harley has separate oils for the tranny/primary and the engine. But none of my Honda's do. They are all going to straight SAE30 unless they are going to the desert to run, then it'll be SAE40...
I see absolutely no advantage for me for wide viscosity spread. I have nothing to gain - zero. But, if I can do a better job protecting the upper ring band with a mono, yah hoo. I hate tearing down a 40 year old engine an looking at 0.015~20 taper (or more) and beat up rings.
The EFI motors are pretty good at keeping the cylinders decent. But all the carb'd stuff needs help. And in my world, that's most of the engines.
And as I get older, I'm seriously leaning on backward on cars and and trucks. In part to get out of Kalif SMOG regs and part because it's stuff I can work on w/o a lap-top...
I just need to find a clean 1974 Celica fast back