Originally Posted By: Jeffs2006EvoIX
From a performance perspective going 100K on plugs is outright ridicolous. I think its a sales hype personally. Most people don't keep their cars long enough to find out if they will last 100K.
Your EVO and a Liberty are two totally different animals. I'm sure there is some slight degradation of plug performance if pushed to factory replacement recs, but unless like you say the engines being pushed hard I doubt it's really noticable.
The 2.5L in my SVT has double plats that according to the owners manual could go 100k, but I replaced them at 70k as the engine gets worked out occasionally and I want to maintain peak performance. When pulled the plugs looked good and I would imagine they'd easily have made 100k.
OTOH, the 4.7 plugs I pulled to replace at 130k had virtually no electrode remaining. Kicker to that is i'll never know how many miles were on those(bought used at 120k), but they were stock P/N Champions that very well could've been In since day one. Even in their poor condition, the truck idled smooth, no missing, no CEL. Just changed 'em for maintenance sake.
I guess my point is unless there's drivability issues(rough idle/CEL), factory rec'ed replacement schedule is more than adequate and changing plugs early just for the sake of doing so is equivelent to dumping synth oil at 3k- a waste of $$$.
But hey, it's not like it's my money. Do whatever floats it for ya! I don't get the iridium fad, either. 2x Plat gives all the longevity you need. It's a spark plug, not a bolt-on performance mod opportunity. It provides a spark or doesn't.
The 3L in the Mazda won't be getting new 2x plats 'till at least 70k.