I have no bone to pick with RP as a company; they are nice people.
For empirical, testable performance, though, I have to agree with Audi. Irreverent as he may be, he does a LOT of testing. RP has consistently proven itself to be shear-prone, refused to license for SM under false "SL-is-better" marketing even though nobody else, even HDEOs, have problems with meeting SM.
There is no way RP, as an oil, is worth its price.
As a company though, it may be. But that's opinion.
For empirical, testable performance, though, I have to agree with Audi. Irreverent as he may be, he does a LOT of testing. RP has consistently proven itself to be shear-prone, refused to license for SM under false "SL-is-better" marketing even though nobody else, even HDEOs, have problems with meeting SM.
There is no way RP, as an oil, is worth its price.
As a company though, it may be. But that's opinion.