OVERKILL
$100 Site Donor 2021
Originally Posted By: BuickGN
Originally Posted By: OVERK1LL
Originally Posted By: BuickGN
Originally Posted By: MarkC
Originally Posted By: BuickGN
Originally Posted By: MarkC
Originally Posted By: tig1
Originally Posted By: MarkC
Someone who knows about such things begs to differ, and believes that a good 5W20 provides much better wear protection than a 5W30....
Not to insult you in any way but how do you know that?
Got it from a well-respected person who knows what he's talking about, based on things other than opinions or guesses.
Not to sound like a [censored], but that's all I can say.
I would love to hear how a quality 20wt provides more protection than a quality 30wt. I think the best you could hope for is the same protection. Unless we're talking about that microsecond difference in time to pressure with the already lubed bearings and cylinders.
Well, if you talk with the right people, maybe they'll tell you.
Maybe 20's are better built. Maybe they actually stay in grade, unlike many 5W30's.
Maybe someone who looks at many, many UOA's is in a better position to say than someone who just guesses.
Or maybe not.
You won't catch me running a 5w-30 but there's nothing wrong with a quality one. I don't look to UOAs to measure wear. They mean nothing as is evidenced by teardowns with a terribly worn out engine producing ok UOAs. I can state this over and over and guys will still ignore it. Use them for trending an engine over it's lifetime but I have absolutely 0 faith in a single UOA whether is shows 0 wear or 999ppm.
Who exactly are the "right" people?
My idea of the "right" person is Doug. A guy with probably 10+ million Km's under his belt of trending and tracking UOA's and oil brands in concert with tear-down testing.
He stated that single-pass UOA's are essentially useless for measuring wear. His explanation makes perfect sense. Nobody wants to hear it is the real issue..........
I put a lot of faith into what Doug has to say. I doubt anyone on this board or any 5 people for that matter could match his real world experience and research.
As do I sir, as do I. I cherish my copy of his book as well. The man is a wealth of wisdom and knowledge, and his massive resume of real world experience, not only with fleet testing, but in doing testing and work FOR Exxon-Mobil, Shell, Castrol...etc.... Simply speaks volumes.
Originally Posted By: OVERK1LL
Originally Posted By: BuickGN
Originally Posted By: MarkC
Originally Posted By: BuickGN
Originally Posted By: MarkC
Originally Posted By: tig1
Originally Posted By: MarkC
Someone who knows about such things begs to differ, and believes that a good 5W20 provides much better wear protection than a 5W30....
Not to insult you in any way but how do you know that?
Got it from a well-respected person who knows what he's talking about, based on things other than opinions or guesses.
Not to sound like a [censored], but that's all I can say.
I would love to hear how a quality 20wt provides more protection than a quality 30wt. I think the best you could hope for is the same protection. Unless we're talking about that microsecond difference in time to pressure with the already lubed bearings and cylinders.
Well, if you talk with the right people, maybe they'll tell you.
Maybe 20's are better built. Maybe they actually stay in grade, unlike many 5W30's.
Maybe someone who looks at many, many UOA's is in a better position to say than someone who just guesses.
Or maybe not.
You won't catch me running a 5w-30 but there's nothing wrong with a quality one. I don't look to UOAs to measure wear. They mean nothing as is evidenced by teardowns with a terribly worn out engine producing ok UOAs. I can state this over and over and guys will still ignore it. Use them for trending an engine over it's lifetime but I have absolutely 0 faith in a single UOA whether is shows 0 wear or 999ppm.
Who exactly are the "right" people?
My idea of the "right" person is Doug. A guy with probably 10+ million Km's under his belt of trending and tracking UOA's and oil brands in concert with tear-down testing.
He stated that single-pass UOA's are essentially useless for measuring wear. His explanation makes perfect sense. Nobody wants to hear it is the real issue..........
I put a lot of faith into what Doug has to say. I doubt anyone on this board or any 5 people for that matter could match his real world experience and research.
As do I sir, as do I. I cherish my copy of his book as well. The man is a wealth of wisdom and knowledge, and his massive resume of real world experience, not only with fleet testing, but in doing testing and work FOR Exxon-Mobil, Shell, Castrol...etc.... Simply speaks volumes.