I'm no fan of Ashland or Valvoline products, but these statements are pretty bold. Ashland must have a legal department they ran them by before publishing the results, and the legal department gave them the OK. Or they are the biggest bunch of a*.*holes going.
Somehow I see XOM coming out on top in all of this. Or they got bagged for marketing and selling a [censored] product, and they got called out.
Either way it makes for some great reading. If it is true anyone who used Mobil 1 and incurred damages will be entitled to payment for these damages from XOM if the oil doesn't meet the required specs. If somehow this got by Ashland's legal dept and the facts are just slightly skewed heads will be rolling, and there will be some new people filing for unemployment benefits. I hope all this comes to a conclusion before my next Mobil 1 OC
.
Frank D
BTW as already mentioned 10W-30 is the number one selling oil, so already some credibility is already lost in my book.
Somehow I see XOM coming out on top in all of this. Or they got bagged for marketing and selling a [censored] product, and they got called out.
Either way it makes for some great reading. If it is true anyone who used Mobil 1 and incurred damages will be entitled to payment for these damages from XOM if the oil doesn't meet the required specs. If somehow this got by Ashland's legal dept and the facts are just slightly skewed heads will be rolling, and there will be some new people filing for unemployment benefits. I hope all this comes to a conclusion before my next Mobil 1 OC
Frank D
BTW as already mentioned 10W-30 is the number one selling oil, so already some credibility is already lost in my book.