Mercedes Confused, Too (re: viscosity)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tim

Joined
Mar 15, 2003
Messages
828
Location
TX
The oil recommendation chart in the owner's manual for my 300SD shows 10W-30 good for -4 to 50F. It shows 5W-30 good for temps no higher that 14F
laugh.gif


No wonder the general public is utterly confused...reading nonsense like that.


Tim
 
I'd assume that Daimler was worried about viscosity at the bearings at startup, or some other sort of issue pertaining to the quality of 5w-vs 10w-30 oils back in the day.

Daimler was the engineering group to trust when it came to automotive topics. Everything they (used to) do was based in thurough analysis.

With your OM617.952 in texas, Id simply put delo 400 or a decent 5w-40 and be happy. Use UOA to ensure that youre not loading up too much soot, and youll get a VERY long life...

You lucky dog - an 89k w126 diesel with an OM617????? I dont like you very much, Im super jealous
wink.gif
 
Quote:


The oil recommendation chart in the owner's manual for my 300SD shows 10W-30 good for -4 to 50F. It shows 5W-30 good for temps no higher that 14F
laugh.gif


No wonder the general public is utterly confused...reading nonsense like that.


Tim




I am sure they are talking about 5W-30 dino oil. Maybe they left out that part or maybe you overlooked it.
 
Quote:




I am sure they are talking about 5W-30 dino oil. Maybe they left out that part or maybe you overlooked it.





I think you are missing the point.

To say one 30wt oil is good to 50F and another, that just happens to have a little better VI or more VII is only good to 14F is nonsense.
 
Quote:


I'd assume that Daimler was worried about viscosity at the bearings at startup, or some other sort of issue pertaining to the quality of 5w-vs 10w-30 oils back in the day.

With your OM617.952 in texas, Id simply put delo 400 or a decent 5w-40 and be happy.
JMH





I think we all worry about viscosity at start-up...and we all know that at any oil temp under 90C the 5W-30 will be closer to correct than the 10W-30.

I am running Schaeffer's S-9000 5W-40.


Tim
 
Quote:


I think you are missing the point.

To say one 30wt oil is good to 50F and another, that just happens to have a little better VI or more VII is only good to 14F is nonsense.




VW and Audi manuals also show an ambient temp limit of -10°C (14°) for 5W-30 multigrade oil -- IF IT'S MINERAL OIL of the lowest quality that still meets the MINIMUM requirements. There is no defined upper ambient temperature restriction on any synthetic oil.
 
Quote:


Quote:




I am sure they are talking about 5W-30 dino oil. Maybe they left out that part or maybe you overlooked it.





I think you are missing the point.

To say one 30wt oil is good to 50F and another, that just happens to have a little better VI or more VII is only good to 14F is nonsense.




It's not nonsense. In 1983 all conventional motor oils were made with Group I base oil and 5w30 was sold only as an "arctic climate" oil not suitable for year-round use in any climate.
 
The manual for my 1980 Pontiac Bonneville, which I had from 1980 to 1986, is somewhat similar in its oil recommendations. It recommends 5W20 from below -20 to +20. It recommends 5W30 only from -20 to +60. It recommends 10W30 and 10W40 from 0 to above 100. It also recommends straight 20 weight, 20W40, and 20W50 when the temperature is above 20, and straight 30 weight when the temperature is above 40. All temperatures are Fahrenheit.

It appears that a lot of manufacturers were not into the 5W20's and 5W30's of the early 80's. All these different viscosity recommendations were typical back before CAFE rules required that manufacturers only mention the viscosity they used when determining the fuel mileage of a given auto. Hence the spreading use of the 5W20 recommendation for many vehicles. It leads me to believe that it doesn't much matter what viscosity oil you use, except for small variations in fuel consumption.
 
Quote:




It's not nonsense. In 1983 all conventional motor oils were made with Group I base oil and 5w30 was sold only as an "arctic climate" oil not suitable for year-round use in any climate.




Are you saying that the VII were so poor in the early 80s (ie sheer prone) that when you added enough to the then available group I basestock to get a 5W-30, you ended up with an oil that would shear to a 20wt in short order?
 
Quote:


Quote:




It's not nonsense. In 1983 all conventional motor oils were made with Group I base oil and 5w30 was sold only as an "arctic climate" oil not suitable for year-round use in any climate.




Are you saying that the VII were so poor in the early 80s (ie sheer prone) that when you added enough to the then available group I basestock to get a 5W-30, you ended up with an oil that would shear to a 20wt in short order?




The VI improvers were not very good back then. It's the reason GM issued a TSB in 1980 forbidding the use of 10w40 due to cam lobe scuffing that was so severe it resulted in engine failures. But with 5w30 the real culprit was Group I base oil. In the cut that would be necessary to blend a 5w30, volatility at operating temps over say 50F would be drastically high. This would result in excessive deposit formation and oxidation.
 
I should have known better than to mock Mercedes engineers!
pat2.gif
hide.gif
 
I'll buy the explanation that back then the Mercedes engineers didn't think much of the 5w-30 mineral oils.

Of course, it begs the question that with today's SM mineral 5w-30, would the Mercedes engineers still hold to this recommendation? I've read in Mercedes forums where drivers for these old cars have used everything from 5w-30 to 20w-50, with no lubrication problems noticed. I'd say most are using some kind of Xw-40.

I've never had any problems with the 15w-40, even in the winter around here.

I had a wheel bearing replaced on the old BMW last month, and the indie mechanic changed the oil for me, putting in Mobil conventional 10w-30. It has an oil recommendation suggesting Xw-30 oils are for winter temperatures. There's only about 700 miles on it. I do notice it revving a little quicker than with the 15w-40 weight oil, but maybe that is my imagination, who knows? Otherwise, no noticeable difference.

My gut tells me that you could probably use Xw-30 conventional oils and as long as you aren't seeing any consumption problems or are taking it to a track, you probably wouldn't have any oil lubrication issues.

Give the 5w-30 conventional a shot and tell us how it goes, I say. There are those of us out there who would be interested in the results. But hey, I'm enjoying reading G-Man's experiments with the straight 30--that's so old school is sounds new and original!
 
Quote:


I'll buy the explanation that back then the Mercedes engineers didn't think much of the 5w-30 mineral oils.

Of course, it begs the question that with today's SM mineral 5w-30, would the Mercedes engineers still hold to this recommendation?




I bet there is at least one BITOGer with a late model Mercedes. Maybe he can check his car's manual.
wink.gif


Do not forget that Mercedes, VW, Audi etc are sold not only in developed nations, but also in developing and 3rd World countries where oil quality may be sub-standard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top