I agree Box. the car manufacturers pass on the costs of the new union contracts on to the consumers. I have seen unions work first hand in a plant I worked at one time. they was the most cocky people I have ever seen. but what ever the union people gets the non unions people gets also. so why I never joined it. they talked about looking out for your intrests. well I saw how they looked out for their people. it was proposed to the union. to goto a 4 day work week of 8 hour shifts. for awhile untill sales came back up. the other option was lay offs. well all the union guys that wasnt affected by the lay off. said no way in **** I am giving up 8 hours of pay for them people to stay. lay them off they all said. so yeah they really look out for their own. all them people that paied union dues just got shafted by the very union they supported to look out for them.
but to the topic at hand. would GM be in a better position if they had no union. I will say no. as the UAW only makes up a percentage of the problem. management is the main problem. I dont see the point of a GM truck and a GMC truck. its the same truck. jsut different makes. think this is one prob GM has. it would be better to jsut let GMC do the trucks and SUV. thst would save them alot of money. they need to cut alot more makes. like they did when they canned OLDS. think these are a few ways I see GM doing better.
but to the topic at hand. would GM be in a better position if they had no union. I will say no. as the UAW only makes up a percentage of the problem. management is the main problem. I dont see the point of a GM truck and a GMC truck. its the same truck. jsut different makes. think this is one prob GM has. it would be better to jsut let GMC do the trucks and SUV. thst would save them alot of money. they need to cut alot more makes. like they did when they canned OLDS. think these are a few ways I see GM doing better.