Absolutely! I enjoy the contribution and enthusiasm.Glenda is a true gem of the forum!
But remember, we are all wrong now and then, here and there, LOL.
___________________________________________________________________
Last edited:
Absolutely! I enjoy the contribution and enthusiasm.Glenda is a true gem of the forum!
Hmm.PDS stayed the same and was updated 04/2025. FYI> I check yesterday out of curiosity.![]()
You're right Arco about the interchange allowance. That is what they list for the 10w30 so you could be right. I'm not sure they all retain that -54F PP or low VI. The 5w30 does specifically show GTL.Hmm.
O.k. then I'll chalk it up to a base stock interchange allowance blend variation. Or Shell cut and paste carelessness.
Or that PP number being incorrect all along.
I may recall (incorrectly?) the 5W-30 FS had a higher pour point (Yes, I know, likened to Project Farm's cold oil soapbox races, LOL)
Maybe we need a prominent vintage displayed on the Jugs, like a fine wine!
If I owned better spectacles I could read those tiny date codes!
thx,
- Arco
We really only find out what is better when the engine fails to the point that someone with the experience and knowledge can point out to a failure or breakdown in lubrication. I broke the wrist pins in my 9th generation Honda Civic that was around 380,000 MI. The joke was that the majority of those cars usually end up needing major major repairs by the time that mine decided to poop out and it probably didn't help that I had 20 horsepower in performance mods in which I did drive it and use those parts on a regular basis. Looking back i don't have any regrets but if I had it to do all over again, i probably would have ran Pennzoil Ultra Platinum with Liquimoly Ceratec 5w30 or Schaeffer's Moly EP 132 right after the free oil changes. I don't know, i never felt real comfortable with the 20 weight synthetics five quart oil capacities in the pan. At that time the new Honda Civic type R was out and it took a 20 weight but I believe it had a huge plus 6 quart. It just all depends on your driving. You would not put mud tires on a car to go drag racing and you surely would not put racing slicks on a car to drive in the middle of winter so I think there is a little bit of give and take the Unicorn tears that we pour in the crankcaseYou’re really trying hard on this, I’ll give you that.
Go read any of the EPA award letters I’ve posted. They are all the same in that there are specific and unambiguous prohibitions against recommending any grade not used for testing. It’s not that it’s “preferred” nor “better” nor “best”. It’s what the manufacturer used for the test and the minimum HT/HS they can recommend to avoid excessive wear.
In the end though it’s still a recommendation. It’s not tied to warranty (warranty is tied to damage), and no oil of a somewhat higher HT/HS is going to cause damage in and of itself. This is why I only use a VW 504 00 oil in my Tiguan that recommends 508 00 approval. The SAPS level is the same and I have the benefit of greater film thickness to counteract the fuel dilution in an EA888.
508 00 oil is not better for this engine. It’s acceptable since VW determined the engine could operate on a reduced HT/HS without excessive wear. But 504 00 oil is better. The amount of “better” can be debated as to whether you find it significant, but I do.
Huh??I am against any sporadic idiotic additives. Waste of money and destroy the excellent oil formulations and the chemistry from the standardized tested additives (cost million of $)
Lubrizol
Oronite (Chevron)
Infineum (Shell Exxon)
Afton Chem ( BP Castrol use it).
Pennzoil, Amsoil, Kirkland, Ravenol, etc. just shake the pre-mix from those 4 giants with base oil of their choice and get the certified Dexos, API, or whatever already formulated. Certain additives requires certain base oil mix too.
Adding Ceratec, STP, etc will negate the excellent formulation. More Mo, ZDDP, or any detergents often 99% reduce the oil performance.
We need a compilation of the best posts on why you can’t use VOA or UOA to determine the quality of the oil. Then we can just link to it when people make the claim.In my quest to find "the best" 508.00/509.00 spec oil, I sent several brands for VOAs. Ravenol VSE came back with almost 2095ppm Calcium and 203ppm Silicon, which puts using it at a higher risk for LSPI.
View attachment 289054
The oil was received from Blauparts on Mar 27, 2025, so shouldn't have been an older formulation. I even sent an email to Ravenol asking about the product based on the VOA sample results and received this reply May 8th. They didn't deny what the VOA showed.@rstcso, thanks for sharing. That is probably the older batch, 2018 standard. The newer 508/509 (2023) also requires LSPI protection.
I was brand new to BITOG during this period and have since learned immensely. Even in emails with LSJr, he drove home this exact point, emphasizing VOA lets you know what a specific oil should look like from a specific lab so when you do UOA, you can start building a database for your specific application. The benefit from doing UOAs is trend analysis, not whether any oil is "best", perhaps catching increasing wear metals before catastrophic failure, as we've seen in others' posts.We need a compilation of the best posts on why you can’t use VOA or UOA to determine the quality of the oil. Then we can just link to it when people make the claim.
Have you heard of Valvoline Restore and Protect?My commuter car drinks 0W-20, so I usually buy Valvoline EP or M1 EP from Wally World in the 5-quart jug. One of them is usually on sale. The Kirkland jugs from Costco are fine also, but I don't go there as often. I strategically minimize my Costco visits because every visit wrecks my bank account. LOL
Yep. I have heard of it, but haven't tried it yet. Honestly, I haven't researched it yet either.Have you heard of Valvoline Restore and Protect?