I was just thinking of the fact that cars that have used dino oil for a long time, and then used syn.oil suddenly, which causes the "crud-seals" to clean-up, which leads to oil consumption/leaks etc...
this happened to me, and the consumption, although very little now, still hasn't stopped 100%..but I'm sure my engine is also cleaner than before.
So, what's better?
a dirty engine which uses no oil due to crud-seals, which keeps using dino, or:
a cleaner engine which has a little oil-consumption/leak due to syn.oil being used?
should I be regretting trying syn.oil for a few times, which started the oil consumption at ca.72k miles, or be thankful that the engine is probably cleaner, despite the "usage" of oil...?
(when i look through the oil fill-hole, all is shiny, and i can read the stamped scripts on the internal parts very easily...i wasn't able to do that before tried syn.oil...)
this happened to me, and the consumption, although very little now, still hasn't stopped 100%..but I'm sure my engine is also cleaner than before.
So, what's better?
a dirty engine which uses no oil due to crud-seals, which keeps using dino, or:
a cleaner engine which has a little oil-consumption/leak due to syn.oil being used?
should I be regretting trying syn.oil for a few times, which started the oil consumption at ca.72k miles, or be thankful that the engine is probably cleaner, despite the "usage" of oil...?
(when i look through the oil fill-hole, all is shiny, and i can read the stamped scripts on the internal parts very easily...i wasn't able to do that before tried syn.oil...)
