quote:The guy I bought my 68 Z from back in the 70s had one of those it was a cool looking car. The shocker was when he raised the hood. He had put in a Big block Chevy.
Originally posted by moribundman: I'd choose a 1963 Studebaker Avanti.![]()
![[Eek!]](images/icons/shocked.gif)
![[Eek!]](images/icons/shocked.gif)
![[Eek!]](images/icons/shocked.gif)
![[Eek!]](images/icons/shocked.gif)
![[Big Grin]](images/icons/grin.gif)
![[Cheers!]](/forums/graemlins/cheers.gif)
quote:The guy I bought my 68 Z from back in the 70s had one of those it was a cool looking car. The shocker was when he raised the hood. He had put in a Big block Chevy.
Originally posted by moribundman: I'd choose a 1963 Studebaker Avanti.![]()
quote:Well, yes, kind of. It just means that there will be some trade-offs. Like the Porche 928, an incredible car for not too much money. It just costs a fortune to maintain. 911's are popular because of their history. However, the 928 is much more of a supercar. The engine swap thing can make cars unique. Like the old days when people would put V8's in a Chevy Vega. Look at that RX-7 with the V8. That would be an interesting car to drive and have. For a bargain sports car the X19 is interesting. Since it is mid engine it handles better than most other small sports cars. Not too many people want them because of the reliability thing. There are other GT cars that are really good, but not very popular. The Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4 is an amazing car, but not too expensive because of the Mitsu name.
Winston - Your stipulation that you don't want anything everybody else has limits you. There is a reason why people covet certain cars - they are good.
quote:
Originally posted by Toy4x4: Sort of biased here as I already have a project! http://img59.imageshack.us/my.php?image=1stchevellepics0066dz.jpg And these can be made to handle with upgraded aftermarket products. It just cost more, thats all.