What is the rarest or strangest, unusual engine you have owned?

I always thought the earlier 302s were more performance oriented than the mid 68s and all of the 69s. The early ones had forged pistons with full floating piston pins. The small journal crankshafts would rev somewhat quicker also.
I went through it. I needed a daily driver. I put a mild hydraulic cam in it. Kept the pop up pistons and double hump heads though. Put a 2 bbl from a 307 on it and stock manifolds. Put it in a full weight 69 Chevelle with a 3 on the tree and 3.08 gears.

Made 1 pass at the drag strip and it did 14.47 with a 2 bbl!
 
I drove and maintained my mom's 1967 Pontiac Tempest wagon with the 230 straight 6 overhead cam engine which was the first time and I have to say the only engine like that I was ever around. It never really had any major problems for the 2 years I drove it, tune up (points & plugs), alternator and oil changes is about all I remember. It was really loud with a mechanical ticking sound coming from that long overhead cam like any overhead cam only louder. Neat engine, homely from rust car, wish it was still around!
 
Question on your 1967 Coronet with poly A 318 engine. Is there a chance that your Coronet was originally a Canadian market car? The '67 Canadian Dodges used the poly A 318 engine one year longer than the US. The 273 LA engine had been around since 1964, but only A bodies, I think. Not doubting you at all.

I had a good bit of wheel time on a '60 Plymouth wagon that my dad owned in the 60's. With a poly A 318 engine. The family also had owned some older Mopar sedans with early hemi block poly head engines and a small bore early hemi. It's amazing that they made those 3 engines in so many different displacements across the brands.
It almost certainly was a Canadian car. Not only was it rumored to be Canadian at the time I bought it, but I was living in North Dakota and we ended up with a fair bit of cross-border pollination.

Parts for it were a hassle compared to later B-bodies. The rear end wasn't the common -489 or -742 series 8 3/4 rear ends, it was a -741, so basically NOTHING available for traction aids, ring and pinion sets and 3rd members. At least that my 16yo boy self could find.

Thankfully it was a B body so most chassis hardware was identical for many years.
 
I had a 1980 Ford Fairmont wagon with the 255 V8. It ran great. Also had a 2965 Corvair Corsa with the 140 hp motor with 4 carbs. It would fly and get 28 mpg on the highway.
 
I had a 76 Mercury Capri with a 2.8 liter Ford Cologne engine. While not rare at all, it was unusual because the the crank and cam were meshed together with two gears and not a timing chain or belt.

My wife had a 76 Honda Accord that I rebuilt. It was a CVCC with a third valve to let in the rich mixture. The valve was the size of a person’s little finger.
Here are two shots of the cam/crank gears. The weird thing is that unlike a set of gears mated by a timing change, the crank and cam rotated in opposite directions, one clockwise and one counter clockwise. The cam had to be ground with the ramps in the the opposite direction from normal. Enjoy.

34E4BF3C-3BF6-418C-BA81-1D37DD0110CC.webp
4D3ACCCB-381C-4DAB-AE13-29A8038C4EF9.webp
 
Do boat engines count for this thread? If so, the Mercruiser 3.7l 4cyl "470" in the boat I sold a few years ago. A Frankenstein nightmare of Ford, GM, and Mercruiser voodoo all cobbled together for tons of fun. Four pistons and the iron head from a Ford 460 big block, mounted to an open deck home grown Mercruiser aluminum block, driving a crank taken from a tractor (I forget what manufacturer), fired by a GM marine distributor, topped with a Mercruiser-modified 4 bbl Quadrajet, with an outboard style permanent magnet and carbon pile charging system capable of boiling your battery in minutes when the water-cooled voltage regulator inevitably failed. All cooled by an internal beltless water pump with its impeller mounted to the end of the camshaft that had a horrible habit of corroding and dumping the antifreeze into the crank when the corrosion chewed up the seals.

It was a seriously torquey beast that sipped gas and pulled like a dang freight train, and in the right hands...someone who really studied and knew the engine, who loved tinkering, had a habit of way over-maintaining things, like modding things and had gasoline in their veins and a lot of tools, it was a fun, reliable, very powerful engine for a small or midsized boat.

In the wrong hands, owned by someone not too mechanically inclined and who liked to skimp on maintenance, it was a horrific money pit of misery, depression and despair that would leave you stranded dead in the water and take every penny of your next four paychecks for endless new head gaskets, warped blocks, leaky water pumps, antifreeze fried bearings, and a burned up charging system if you dared to even glance at it with the wrong attitude.
 
Yes officially imported and sold by Toyota in the USA for several years. Not just one year.
My dad bought one new. Humongous pile of steaming turd. NA (non turbo) was dangerously slow to accelerate and the crappy 5 speed trans was not up to the diesel pounding power pulses and failed regularly. Interior was penalty box uncomfortable with a fresh air vent that could not be closed even in freezing wx. That was the second worse vehicle I have ever had the displeasure of driving.
 
1984 Audi 5000 with Inline 5 . I experienced the sudden acceleration problem with my foot on the brake at a red light .
 
My current car, the Jag F-Type has a supercharged 3.0 V6 that is a V8 block with the aft 2 pistons removed. They did not shorten the block or the 5 main bearing crankshaft. It just has a counterweight where the aft 2 connecting rod journals would have been.

Jag's engineers seemed to really take the cheesy way out for a V6. However, the result is way better than expected. It's a blast to drive, and can handle a lot of boost due to a lot of head gasket surface area and strong internals.

10_Block_amd-1240x775.jpg.webp

03_Crank_amd-1240x775.jpg.webp

Same engine in the Disco my parents have. Doesn't have the sound of the 4.4 in the LR3, but goes good enough. Funny thing too is the 3.7 in the Liberty is the same thing - V8 made into a V6.
 
Back
Top Bottom