We have had a lot of discussion regarding the use of thicker 30 weight oils in GM engines. A recent thread discussing HM oils got me thinking about using it in my 5.3L engine. I believe that the 5.3L is a cast iron LS1 derivative (correct me if I am wrong).
Here is my thinking:
HM Oils are typically around 12 cst @ 100C vs 10.5 for CAFE compliant oils (dino and synthetic). Since fuel economy and newer formulation restrictions are not an issue....perhaps these HM oils are "optimized" for wear resistance vs. gas mileage.
Molakule indicated that the levels of additional seal conditioners would only be at a minimal level. Does anyone think that using these products in a relatively new engine would be an issue?
I would like to hear your thoughts and comments on this approach. A lot of people really like MaxLife and Castrol High Mileage, but what about for an engine with <50,000 miles?
Here is my thinking:
HM Oils are typically around 12 cst @ 100C vs 10.5 for CAFE compliant oils (dino and synthetic). Since fuel economy and newer formulation restrictions are not an issue....perhaps these HM oils are "optimized" for wear resistance vs. gas mileage.
Molakule indicated that the levels of additional seal conditioners would only be at a minimal level. Does anyone think that using these products in a relatively new engine would be an issue?
I would like to hear your thoughts and comments on this approach. A lot of people really like MaxLife and Castrol High Mileage, but what about for an engine with <50,000 miles?