More a question of finding a squadron willing to do the shoot. They had to have the time in their schedule, and be willing to do the flying.I found it odd that they used a carrier and squadrons based in the Atlantic and used a fictional account where they’re based in the Pacific. I guess it made it convenient to fit them into a plot where they try to stop the attack on Pearl Harbor.
The average movie goer would have no idea that was the case, nor would they care.I found it odd that they used a carrier and squadrons based in the Atlantic and used a fictional account where they’re based in the Pacific. I guess it made it convenient to fit them into a plot where they try to stop the attack on Pearl Harbor.
The average movie goer would have no idea that was the case, nor would they care.
I remember maybe 15 or so years ago seeing this movie show up on some random channel on a Friday night. I had never heard of it and was totally fascinated by it.
I saw it on ABC back in the early 80s, well before Top Gun came out. I knew what an F-14 was at the time, as my dad bought me Revell scale models of one (VF-84) as well as one of the USS Eisenhower.
As far as the USS Nimitz, I think I saw it briefly in another movie. There was a scene in the movie Aloha where there’s a brief scene of an aircraft carrier passing by, and the number is 68.
Callsigns were bestowed by squadron mates and not the choice of the person.