Hi everyone,
I need to have the radiator replaced in my 2000 Celica GT-S. My car has 30,000 miles on it and it is driven infrequently at best, it stays in the garage most of the time.
The 7th gen Celica is notoriously hard to bleed the cooling system……unless you follow the Toyota procedure. I assume Toyota realized that the system can be difficult to bleed since they actually put a sticker under the hood detailing the bleeding procedure.
The procedure is basically:
Raise the reservoir up
Fill reservoir
Run the engine for fifteen minutes alternating between 3,000 rpm and idle
Check coolant level
The Celica radiator is also closed in that it has no radiator cap. All filling is done using the coolant reservoir.
I talked to the shop that will probably do the job and they want to vacuum bleed my car. They have no interest in the Toyota procedure because they feel the vacuum method is far superior.
What is my concern? I have read numerous “stories” that speak of cooling system damage (leaks) after using the vacuum method. Supposedly it puts undue stress on the system. Is any of that true? Given the my car is 25 years old, I’d rather avoid any issues.
What does the collective think?
Thank you
I need to have the radiator replaced in my 2000 Celica GT-S. My car has 30,000 miles on it and it is driven infrequently at best, it stays in the garage most of the time.
The 7th gen Celica is notoriously hard to bleed the cooling system……unless you follow the Toyota procedure. I assume Toyota realized that the system can be difficult to bleed since they actually put a sticker under the hood detailing the bleeding procedure.
The procedure is basically:
Raise the reservoir up
Fill reservoir
Run the engine for fifteen minutes alternating between 3,000 rpm and idle
Check coolant level
The Celica radiator is also closed in that it has no radiator cap. All filling is done using the coolant reservoir.
I talked to the shop that will probably do the job and they want to vacuum bleed my car. They have no interest in the Toyota procedure because they feel the vacuum method is far superior.
What is my concern? I have read numerous “stories” that speak of cooling system damage (leaks) after using the vacuum method. Supposedly it puts undue stress on the system. Is any of that true? Given the my car is 25 years old, I’d rather avoid any issues.
What does the collective think?
Thank you
Last edited: