Has anyone seen the commercial referred to
in the first and last pieces? What are your thoughts regarding the opinions expressed therein?
The second piece might draw some good commentary, too.
quote:I really don't think that driving an SUV means that you support the use of military force to acquire oil. There's things you can control, and things you can't. I can't personally control gas prices or what the governments do to get oil, but I'll continue to use as much petroleum as I can reasonably afford. I did see a bumper sticker that seemed a little out of place on an Explorer. It said: "All in Favor of Saving Fuel, Raise Your Right Foot". Is that supposed to mean drive slower? I drive at the speed limit anyway, but I could drive everywhere at 100mph and still use less gas than that thing!
Originally posted by brianl703: I once saw a Toyota Landcruiser..which, if I'm not mistaken, is the biggest, most gas-thirsty SUV they sell (13/16 city/highway)..with a "NO WAR FOR OIL" sticker on it.
quote:If you don't approve of how it is acquired, use less of it. Then, perhaps, those distasteful methods by which it is acquired won't be necessary.
Originally posted by rpn453: I really don't think that driving an SUV means that you support the use of military force to acquire oil.
quote:I have driven a Toyota 4runner over the last 6 years. I was a marcher against invading Iraq--so I certainly cannot be called one who supported a war for oil. I also happen to get around 19MPG driving t and from work and 22MPG on the highway. Not great, but not that bad either. And to boot, it has been the most reliable car I have ever driven, and is running like a top at 125K miles. Over the last 3 years, I have put over 1,000 bags of dirt, manuer, compost, and mulch in the back of this vehicle. So, anything smaller really would not be all that useful to my weekend activities. And then 2-3 times a year I actually take this 2WD vehicle up some pretty terrible roads to the astronomical observing site in Ft Davis Tx carrying several hundred pounds of telescopes--none of which would fit in a regular car or station wagon of modern ilk. On the other hand, I really don't want a larger SUV either. And for the record, it has been washed twice.....
Originally posted by rpn453: I really don't think that driving an SUV means that you support the use of military force to acquire oil.
quote:I hope you caught whoever did it and punished them
Originally posted by Mitch Alsup: And for the record, it has been washed twice.....
quote:If you scale that back to a year or year-and-a-half, we use our 'family' vehicle quite similarly. We don't haul any telescopes any more, as I sold them a few years ago. Nevertheless, we appear to do very similar things on weekends and such. We do them with a Neon and a small, fold-up trailer I put together and built some removable sides and a floor for. We get ~50% better fuel economy with our method than what you listed with yours. I didn't march in any way regarding either Iraqi war, except to show support for the soldiers. I wish we were not in Iraq at this point.
Over the last 3 years, I have put over 1,000 bags of dirt, manuer, compost, and mulch in the back of this vehicle. So, anything smaller really would not be all that useful to my weekend activities.
quote:What do you consider "bad"?
Originally posted by Mitch Alsup: I also happen to get around 19MPG driving t and from work and 22MPG on the highway. Not great, but not that bad either.