Toyota Genuine Motor Oil - old -vs new (latest)

Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
1,147
Location
California
I had to take my 2019 Tacoma to the Dealer for it's warranty stuff, and while I was there I took a couple of photos of the "new" (or at least, latest) TGMO that one of my local Dealer has on hand. I've uploaded photos I have of the old, SN stuff as well as the new SN-Plus. [Linked Image] [Linked Image] Besides the SN-Plus rating, I'm not sure if anything else has changed? Ed
 
Joined
Aug 1, 2017
Messages
2,646
Location
WA
I can tell by looking at the bottles that the one on the right has much less moly than the old formulation! or maybe Gokhan said that. lol That's not good idea grin2
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2008
Messages
12,897
Location
OH
Mobil 1 Extended Performance High Mileage 0w20. :)

edit: sorry wrong thread, thought I was posting in the latest oil purchase thread.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
359
Is the "new" TGMO formulation still as respected as the "old" TGMO formulation is on BITOG as far as VOA/add pack analysis. I've searched and can't find anything.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2009
Messages
8,032
Location
Wet side WA
I had to take my 2019 Tacoma to the Dealer for it's warranty stuff, and while I was there I took a couple of photos of the "new" (or at least, latest) TGMO that one of my local Dealer has on hand. I've uploaded photos I have of the old, SN stuff as well as the new SN-Plus. Besides the SN-Plus rating, I'm not sure if anything else has changed? Ed

In my mind the only nagging question is how proud of that oil were they? Oh do they offer rebates?
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
5,872
Location
Paramount, California
I had to take my 2019 Tacoma to the Dealer for it's warranty stuff, and while I was there I took a couple of photos of the "new" (or at least, latest) TGMO that one of my local Dealer has on hand. I've uploaded photos I have of the old, SN stuff as well as the new SN-Plus. [Linked Image] [Linked Image] Besides the SN-Plus rating, I'm not sure if anything else has changed? Ed
Thanks for posting this. Yes, the bottle tells (almost) everything.

There is a four-digit formulation number (revision number) on the back label of all ExxonMobil oils. By looking at this number, you can tell what the formulation is.

The original TGMO 0W-20 SN had RN5953. It was Group-III-based and looked liked it had a lot of polyol ester (POE) if my FTIR oxidation number was correct. It also used trinuclear moly.

Years later PQIA tested a TGMO 0W-20 SN that had RN6378. It was GTL-based with a very high amount of 787 ppm sulfurless Molyvan 855 moly. It also likely had some POE according to Russian FTIR data, but it was only a few percent if at all. TGMO seems to like to have ester.

The SN PLUS version you posted also has RN6378; therefore, the formulation hasn't changed for the last two years or so. You can see the PQIA VOA of this formulation here. Note that the PQIA version is labeled SN but it is the same RN6378 formulation.

Now, someone needs to find the SP bottle so that we can see if the SP formulation is different.

Moreover, if you could also post the four-digit RN numbers for TGMO 0W-16, it would be appreciated. In a few years most newer Toyota engines will use 0W-16. Already almost half of them use it.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
1,330
Location
California
Thanks for posting this. Yes, the bottle tells (almost) everything.

There is a four-digit formulation number (revision number) on the back label of all ExxonMobil oils. By looking at this number, you can tell what the formulation is.

The original TGMO 0W-20 SN had RN5953. It was Group-III-based and looked liked it had a lot of polyol ester (POE) if my FTIR oxidation number was correct. It also used trinuclear moly.

Years later PQIA tested a TGMO 0W-20 SN that had RN6378. It was GTL-based with a very high amount of 787 ppm sulfurless Molyvan 855 moly. It also likely had some POE according to Russian FTIR data, but it was only a few percent if at all. TGMO seems to like to have ester.

The SN PLUS version you posted also has RN6378; therefore, the formulation hasn't changed for the last two years or so. You can see the PQIA VOA of this formulation here. Note that the PQIA version is labeled SN but it is the same RN6378 formulation.

Now, someone needs to find the SP bottle so that we can see if the SP formulation is different.

Moreover, if you could also post the four-digit RN numbers for TGMO 0W-16, it would be appreciated. In a few years most newer Toyota engines will use 0W-16. Already almost half of them use it.

TGMO 0W16 RN6378.
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2003
Messages
5,349
Location
Decatur AL USA
Really? How can 0W-16 and 0W-20 have the same RN? Could you post a photo of the back label?

I don't know but this has RN6378 printed on it too.
1598912293710.png
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
5,872
Location
Paramount, California
I don't know but this has RN6378 printed on it too.
View attachment 28260
Thanks. Interesting. Perhaps they share the four-digit revision number across the viscosity grades within the same brand.

This could be checked by comparing the RN's for M1 5W-20 vs. M1 5W-30 or M1 EP 5W-20 vs. M1 EP 5W-30 etc.

The date code 10219K24A means Plant 102, 2019 November (K = 11th letter) 24.

The QR codes merely identify the print versions for the front and back labels, not the formulation. Labels may change while the formulation remains the same, or the formulation may change while the labels remain the same.
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2002
Messages
35,432
Location
NJ
It wouldn't surprise me if TGMO had POE. An XOM salesman that was once on this board had mentioned Toyota requested high end ingredients for this oil.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
33
Location
Milford DE
Thanks for posting this. Yes, the bottle tells (almost) everything.

There is a four-digit formulation number (revision number) on the back label of all ExxonMobil oils. By looking at this number, you can tell what the formulation is.

The original TGMO 0W-20 SN had RN5953. It was Group-III-based and looked liked it had a lot of polyol ester (POE) if my FTIR oxidation number was correct. It also used trinuclear moly.

Years later PQIA tested a TGMO 0W-20 SN that had RN6378. It was GTL-based with a very high amount of 787 ppm sulfurless Molyvan 855 moly. It also likely had some POE according to Russian FTIR data, but it was only a few percent if at all. TGMO seems to like to have ester.

The SN PLUS version you posted also has RN6378; therefore, the formulation hasn't changed for the last two years or so. You can see the PQIA VOA of this formulation here. Note that the PQIA version is labeled SN but it is the same RN6378 formulation.

Now, someone needs to find the SP bottle so that we can see if the SP formulation is different.

Moreover, if you could also post the four-digit RN numbers for TGMO 0W-16, it would be appreciated. In a few years most newer Toyota engines will use 0W-16. Already almost half of them use it.
 
Top