Thinking about what Terry said, it looks as though Mobil may indeed be relying on high-tech esters (with a little moly) for wear protection, whereas Amsoil is still taking the "old fashioned" route by just loading the oil up with zinc and phosphorous. [/QB][/QUOTE]quote:
Originally posted by G-Man II:
[/qb]
--------------------------------------------------
MolaKule has posted for months now about the advanced Esters and the dual roles they play in the SS formulation. He has posted some really good info on this oil. For Mobil to produce this line of oils that meet these tough Euro Specs along with being a API Certified product for use under warranty and keep the cost where it is to the consumers is truely remarkable IMO and and goes full circle back to the topic. If they make ALL the base oils and ALL the add packs it will and does cut the cost down.Could they give us a better oil? Yeah but I think the Automakers should first make some better motors to use it in
Amsoil just for example must have their base oils and add packs shipped to them and that alone must to an extent margin the price up and you know Mobil is making money selling them the base oil,Lubrizol is making a profit on the add packs. I would assume it is the same deal for Redline and others.
Before I forget,I do not think price reflects the performance of an oil under all circumstances.I would sure like to open some eyes with two dinos in particular,one a group II ,the other a group II with a little over 3 buck a quart price difference,I cannot do a back to back test because of Oklahomas weather
Sure there are other fine oils,,like cars there is a butt for every seat
[ February 11, 2003, 12:38 PM: Message edited by: dragboat ]