Originally Posted By: CATERHAM
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Well and neither is M1, as you mention. So why would using Toyota oil be so dangerous as to "require" a UOA before use?
Exactly, in fact it's viscosity characteristic much more closely approximate the OEM oil that Honda Canada specifies. Yes the 200 VI Idemitsu 0W-20 is still what Honda/Acura Canada uses although Honda USA switched to CoP. Even so, the CoP made 0W-20 is still lighter (higher VI and lower HTHSV) than M1 0W-20 and all OTC aftermarket 0W-20s.
While Idemitsu may still be Honda's supplier in Canada, I seriously doubt that the oil they're supplying is the same as the 200 VI GF-4 formula.
Provide proof or it didn't happen. Remember, I got low moly ~170 VI Idemitsu oil in a Subaru bottle labeled API SM/GF-4 . Reasonable speculation would indicate it's an SN/GF-5 formula in mis-labeled bottles. It's been over a year since formulators were supposed to stop shipping GF-4 oil.
Originally Posted By: kschachn
Well and neither is M1, as you mention. So why would using Toyota oil be so dangerous as to "require" a UOA before use?
Exactly, in fact it's viscosity characteristic much more closely approximate the OEM oil that Honda Canada specifies. Yes the 200 VI Idemitsu 0W-20 is still what Honda/Acura Canada uses although Honda USA switched to CoP. Even so, the CoP made 0W-20 is still lighter (higher VI and lower HTHSV) than M1 0W-20 and all OTC aftermarket 0W-20s.
While Idemitsu may still be Honda's supplier in Canada, I seriously doubt that the oil they're supplying is the same as the 200 VI GF-4 formula.
Provide proof or it didn't happen. Remember, I got low moly ~170 VI Idemitsu oil in a Subaru bottle labeled API SM/GF-4 . Reasonable speculation would indicate it's an SN/GF-5 formula in mis-labeled bottles. It's been over a year since formulators were supposed to stop shipping GF-4 oil.