I heard it first from George Morrison who said, "TBN has no relevance for gasoline powered engines. TBN is for diesel engines, diesel oil, to neutralize acids by products produced from the diesel fuel. A gasoline engine does not produce acid by-products in that manner, thus TBN is not a gasoline oil determinate."
Then I heard it again from WearCheck, who did my last oil analysis and gave me TAN rather than TBN on my last report, "We give TAN for gasoline engines because it's a much better test than TBN. It's a direct physical measurement of the buildup of acid in the oil."
I did a google search and found a paper devoted to this exact subject by Swepco USA.
quote:Finally, I emailed Dexsil and asked, "Which method, TAN or TBN, is best for determining the useful life of motor oil in a gasoline engine?" Their answer:
Because the chemistries used to make up TBN can differ in quality and ability to maintain effectiveness over extended drain intervals, the TAN test and results is the most accurate measure of the oils on-going ability to resist degradation from greater level of acidity. This definitely makes the TAN test the preferred test method for used oil analysis...expecially in determining extended drain capabilities of a wide variety of oils.
quote:If TAN is the better test for gasoline powered engines, why do so many folks use TBN?
The TAN is the kit you would want to use for a gasoline engine. (The TBN kit is used for diesel powered engines.) The TAN kit determines the amount of acid build-up due to oxidation of the oil. However, there are other considerations in determining the useful life of motor oils - i.e. water, particulate matter (due to friction of the metal parts)...