Many taildraggers give you the option of a 3-point or a wheel landing.
A 3-point means all 3 wheels touch down at the same time. It means flying a tad slower on touchdown with more angle of attack (nose-up attitude). If you are a bit too slow on a 3-pointer then the tailwheel will touch first. This can range from no big deal if it's very slight/gentle, to damaging the tail wheel and bouncing, where you'd punch in power, go around, and try it again. Depending on the airplane and conditions.
A wheel landing means you touch down the main wheels only, then gently lower the tail as you roll out on the main wheels. It means flying at touchdown with less angle of attack. Just as the main wheels touch down, you apply a tad of forward pressure to the stick to hold them down, but no more than necessary because you don't want to slam it down and bounce. Then you gradually reduce that pressure and bring the tailwheel down.
In both kinds of landings, your feet are busy on the rudder pedals keeping the airplane pointed forward because the weight is behind you and wants to swing around as you slow down. Similar to oversteer in a car, if you let it develop before correcting it, it's too late. You have to sense and correct it before it develops, so it's a constant back and forth of small quick inputs.
Which to use (3-pointer or wheel) depends on the airplane and the conditions. For example, in the Cessna 170s that I have flown, I would do 3-pointers under most conditions, but wheel landings in stiffer crosswinds as it gives you better lateral control. With other airplanes, a wheel landing is standard under most conditions. One of the things my instructor did when I was earning my taildragger endorsement was pull power on the downwind leg, say "you just lost your engine". I'd maneuver to do a power-off 180, and on short final he'd tell me whether to do a 3-point or wheel landing.
PS: more on this topic:
https://www.avweb.com/flight-safety/technique/tailwheel-landing-battle-three-point-or-wheel/