Sustina 0w20 with a VI of 229

Status
Not open for further replies.
5:31 ouch ouch ouch ouch :P Its an interesting 15min video thats not too much marketing speak with no facts.
 
Originally Posted By: dparm
Now if they would only release more product data...
What kind of product data are you looking for? PP FP VI CCS ? TBN?
 
^ Yes to all of the above. Also want to know what specs it meets/beats (ACEA and such), and any approvals (MB, VW, etc). HTHS also important. The 0w50 is intriguing.
 
They do get credit for an informative and technically-oriented video, though. Cool to see viscosity index demonstrated.
 
Originally Posted By: dparm
They do get credit for an informative and technically-oriented video, though. Cool to see viscosity index demonstrated.
I want to point all the people that say 0w means its the viscosity of water when hot.. to that video ;p http://www.worldpac.com/tagged/ENEOS_Motor_Oil_SUSTINA_0W-20_US3220-300.pdf Some stuff in there PP -45C FP 234C syn oil >70% additives <30% VI = 229 IMO A TBN would be worthless with a totally different type of chemistry with 70% less sulfur in it.
 
Last edited:
0w50's PP is -45 C and FP is 228 C. Density is listed as 0.845 which is about on-par with most 0w40s and the only other 0w50 I know of. Nothing to write home about. Still curious to see the VI for the other grades. The video shows metal containers of 5w40, among others. There are two other 0w50s that I know of: Mobil 1 Racing 0w50 VI 189 HTHS 4.1 PP -51 C FP 221 C TBN ?? Eneos 0w50 VI 189 HTHS ?? PP ?? FP 232 c TBN 6.4 I see their US operations are in the far Chicago suburbs. Maybe I ought to pay them a visit?
 
Well, I was browsing bunch of Japanese forums trying to find UOA or VOA, no luck yet. But people there like it a lot, saying that Sustina 0w-50 is M1 0w-40 killer. Them and Eneos claiming that those oils use most advanced base oil available as for today. Also it is claimed to clean very good.
 
Last edited:
0w30 has never been quite as popular for whatever reason. I bet you could mix the 5w40 and 0w20 to get a psuedo-0w30. :)
 
Buster thanks for posting. The video explaining VI was cool, I couldn't have said it better myself. While they emphasis the fuel economy advantage, that's not why I prefer high VI oil's. It's for the improved driveability, power and safety (abilty to use high rev's with a cold engine). The 0W-20 with the 229 VI is now the lightest oil available on start-up subplanting the Toyota Brand 0W-20 at "only" 216. The thing is the price. And with a suggested retail of $11.99/qt, that's steep but I'm sure with time we should be able to get it for less. The Cdn price is $14.99/L which is nuts being 3X the price of the Toyota 0W-20. It will be interesting to see the spec's on the Sustina 0W-50. It will undoubtedly have a higher VI than the ENEOS 0W-50 which has an already high 192 VI. The HTHSV from memory for ENEOS was 4.1-4.2cP so I'm sure it will be similar. But the suggested retail price of $13.99/qt is steep but I'm sure it will sell for less.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top