So... is GC really so shear stable?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
764
Location
Fairfield County, CT
Check this out; let me know if I've made any errors... For the first two cars I'm using a VOA viscosity of 65.9 (which is the average of 65.8, 65.8, 65.9, and 66.2, gathered from 4 Blackstone virgin reports) And for the third (Patman's sister's car) I'm using Patman's VOA viscosity of 12.2. Patman, are those viscosities from the same lab? (Wearcheck?)
code:
car                 miles    UOA visc  %visc loss
Toyota Sienna       4648      62.0        5.9
Honda Civic b16a    5279      62.8        4.7
Honda Civic         5500      11.5        5.7

Hmmm... [ October 06, 2003, 10:49 PM: Message edited by: quadrun1 ]
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Messages
8,937
Location
SC
The only way to really judge is to compare the VOA vis of the SAME oil you're doing the UOA on, not an average vis from a bunch of different VOAs. We'll be finding out how well this oil has held up in my Chrysler shortly. FWIW, I think any multigrade oil is going to shear some. "Shear stability" is a relative thing, and relatively speaking, the GC seems to be shear stable.
 

Patman

Staff member
Joined
May 27, 2002
Messages
22,034
Location
Guelph, Ontario
Yes, both the virgin sample I sent and the UOA on my sister's car were from Wearcheck. The one thing though is that the oil I put in my sister's car was from a different batch than the VOA oil, so it is possible her oil was slightly different in viscosity. Also remember, it was her first run with GC, so there is a little bit of the thinner M1 mixed in there. Her second UOA (which I'll have in a couple of weeks) will be the better one to see for viscosity. And my own UOA (due next week) will be good too, since before I put in the GC I have now, I ran a 3L rinse cycle to try and get close to 100% GC in my engine for this run. And the batch in my car is the same as the VOA too.
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Messages
5,358
Location
Gone
quote:
Originally posted by Eiron: How 'bout these shear numbers I figured a few weeks ago? Or these recalculated shear numbers I figured the next day? (I threw out the worst example.) Yes, I'd say EC 0W-30 looks very good too. Almost as good as M1 0W-40 ... [Wink]
Eiron, You just don't give up do you? [Big Grin] Well, neither do "we," so here's to healthy and collegial competition. [Cheers!] [ October 07, 2003, 01:08 PM: Message edited by: pscholte ]
 

quadrun1

Thread starter
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
764
Location
Fairfield County, CT
There are some good M1 numbers too! M1 0W-40 in G-Man's Olds minivan (4200 miles) thinned only about 1% After 5,000 miles in an Audi S4 twin-turbo and also after 5K in an Audi 1.8T, M1 0W-40 thinned about 6%. In the S4, the M1 0W-40 wear numbers were about that same as Amsoil S2K. I think it's a close call, these are both very good oils!
 

Patman

Staff member
Joined
May 27, 2002
Messages
22,034
Location
Guelph, Ontario
What we really need to see is someone run 2 intervals with 0w40 M1, then two intervals with GC 0w30, in the same engine, in order to see the behavior of the two.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top