So far

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 28, 2002
Messages
70,748
Location
Everson WA - Pacific NW USA
Amos Kloner, the first archaeologist to examine the site, said the idea fails to hold up by archaeological standards but makes for profitable television.

"They just want to get money for it," Kloner said.
 
It's odd that there is no mention of this documentary on the IMDb. As it turns out 'The Lost Tomb of Chr¡st' is indeed by Cameron and Jacobovici, who also made 'The Exodus Decoded.'

Money is a great motivator, eh? Oh well, I'm glad to see nobody here is into money.
wink.gif
 
Quote:


Who said there was anything bad about making money? It's the "how" part that messes it all up for people.




Sorry, I don't see how a movie, documentary or not, "messes it all up for people." I just don't see the relevance one way or the other. Whatever theory is put forward doesn't offend me. I may agree or disagree with it, but I will not find it offensive -- especially not if I haven't had a chance to examine the proposed theory for myself. What's the big deal? Are you afraid that something that is shown on tv will go down as irrefutable fact?
dunno.gif
 
Quote:


Quote:


Who said there was anything bad about making money? It's the "how" part that messes it all up for people.




Sorry, I don't see how a movie, documentary or not, "messes it all up for people." I just don't see the relevance one way or the other. Whatever theory is put forward doesn't offend me. I may agree or disagree with it, but I will not find it offensive -- especially not if I haven't had a chance to examine the proposed theory for myself. What's the big deal? Are you afraid that something that is shown on tv will go down as irrefutable fact?
dunno.gif





Absolutely not worried, let the facts stand. However - you had a great definition of FAITH earlier. This show will be presented as TRUTH and FACT. There is a difference as you stated. In this case by presenting stretched "science", falsehoods, etc a.k.a. lies, to sell a show and make money -I have a problem with that. Let's see the word choice during the show....but if their web site is any indication - they are putting it forth as fact - with little other direct opposition during the show. THAT troubles me.
 
Also - here:

Quote:


Who said there was anything bad about making money? It's the "how" part that messes it all up for people.




I was talking generally - I tend to think there are clean and unclean ways to make money. To each his own, I guess.
 
Quote:


I was talking generally - I tend to think there are clean and unclean ways to make money.




I don't dispute that at all. I simply won't jump the gun one something about that I have heard nothing but what the media, which you generally despise, has reported so far in a few blurbs. Again, I don't have a crystal ball.
 
Nope, I haven't. It's not a topic that interest me enough. For me it's just about the principle. I won't condemn something unless I have good reason to do so.
wink.gif


I wish Cameron had done T3. It would have been better than that garbage Mostow directed in 2003. Here's hoping to hoping that 'Avatar' will be good.
cheers.gif
 
Quote:





In this case by presenting stretched "science", falsehoods, etc a.k.a. lies, to sell a show and make money -I have a problem with that. Let's see the word choice during the show....




You haven't even seen the freakin show! The fact that a tomb with the disclosed contents was found is a FACT. Don't speculate about the unknown................oh wait.....

ufo.gif
 
Why the diddly am "I hoping to hoping"? How do these things happen? I blame buster -- who is oddly absent. *shifty eyes left and right*
 
This stuff is old, the tomb was found 10 years ago. The name on the ossuary may not even be
J esus. Translating old semitic carvings is notoiously difficult. This is just noise.
 
Not trying to be religious in any way (I don't know what happened to the other post-I guess it was considered too religious), I am still troubled by the statistics that are being used in this research. I watched a program on TV (I think the History Channel) and the people doing this research were using statistics like only 9% of men had this name (the name we cannot use), only 14% or something like that had that name and a father named Joseph, only a small number of women had the name Mary, etc. And this was being used by the people involved in the research as strong evidence that the tomb in question was, you know, that guy (naming no names).

I just now saw on Fox News that apparently there is strong evidence that 25% of all women at that time in that area were named Mary. And there is a document from the time in which there were 3 men involved all with the same name (the name we cannot use).

So I think there is a strong possibility that this research on this tomb will be proven false just on the basis of incorrect statistics.

They also have to date the tomb (actually tombs) which I don't think has been done yet. And the Israeli scientists seem to have little respect for the current research.

Now, none of this is religious-right? We are talking statistics and dating of remains and stuff like that.

I had every intention of going to see this documentary or film. Now, I don't think so. Just on the basis of statistics being used by the people involved in the research project that are apparently incorrect, go against what is actually known, and not worth the paper they are printed on, it is not worth my time to see the film or documentary. I will give it a pass.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom