If the engine is built for a turbo, it shouldn't be a problem...I don't think that replacing the turbo is necessarily all that hard, it what having the turbo does to the rest of the engine that is going to be an issue.
If the engine is built for a turbo, it shouldn't be a problem...I don't think that replacing the turbo is necessarily all that hard, it what having the turbo does to the rest of the engine that is going to be an issue.
My '04 now has 432K...still going strong...a corolla still going by the way. Only things i have done is change the oil every 5,000 change the tranny fluid when the color starts changing. Sill uses zero oil.
Sounds like our Tiguan, horrible high rpm power but snappy from light to light. They detuned it for a reason and the tractorish sound based on the modified engine cycle is oddly soothing.The only way to completely eliminate lag is by using a boost system that keeps the primary turbo on boost all the time. This is exactly what Mazda's Skyactive system does...
Turbo lag on the 2014 2L Escape I just sold was cured with a free flowing cat-back exhaust system.Most of these turbo engines make full boost and torque at less than 1500rpm. Turbo lag died in the 90s.
We have the CX-9, but it seems to have excellent power everywhere. Its bottom end pulls hard enough that it doesn't need to rev much...but it certainly will if you want it to...Sounds like our Tiguan, horrible high rpm power but snappy from light to light. They detuned it for a reason and the tractorish sound based on the modified engine cycle is oddly soothing.
![]()
Here's How Volkswagen's New Engine Cycle Is Making Its Cars More Efficient
It's amazing what the tiniest change can do for an engine's efficiency.www.roadandtrack.com
The 1.5 turbo I drove could be timed with a sun dial...my CX-9 would tow it quicker than it can go on its own...The 0-60 on a CRV is about 8 seconds pretty much the same as all the other similarly priced midsize SUVs. It is what it is.
The 0-60 on a CRV is about 8 seconds pretty much the same as all the other similarly priced midsize SUVs. It is what it is.
The power is there with an ECU tweak but I imagine it was reduced for emissions more than anything. I mean getting 30MPG on the highway in an SUV isn't bad.We have the CX-9, but it seems to have excellent power everywhere. Its bottom end pulls hard enough that it doesn't need to rev much...but it certainly will if you want it to...
fun car, i did an engine swap in one. the 2.3 which is very similar to a ford duratech doesn't like being lugged. look up zoom zoom boom. the one I had the pleasure of working on was a ricer boy's and was definitely thrased hard. put a new engine and big turbo in it. that was last year. car had 150,000 miles on it when I had it. we told him to drive it gently and it would last longer. im guessing you didn't constantly go WOT off of idle with your Mazdaspeed. im pretty sure maintenance is mostly what kills turbo 4bangers, along with running them hard before they're warm or short tripping them.I ran a mildly tuned Mazdaspeed 3 from 2007 to 2015 for a total of 158k miles. UOA indicated that an OCI of 7.5k miles on M1 was, if anything, conservative. I only sold it because I wanted a RWD track toy. For me 150k-200k miles is the maximum distance I enjoy owning a car(my Club Sport and Wrangler excepted). Couple that with the fact that I’ve owned 6 turbo cars since 1993, and it should be obvious that I don’t suffer from forced induction phobia.
My '04 now has 432K...still going strong...
A few, but nothing major. Most expensive repair was the exhaust system (the cat alone was $600). Next expensive was probably replacing the hydraulic lines between the tranny and radiator (those had to come from Toyota, and just the lines with the fittings were $400+). The rest has been relatively inexpensive stuff like a radiator (aftermarket), alternator, wheel bearings, 1 window regulator, valve cover gasket, and having a sealant put in the A/C system and recharged. It still has original tranny, water pump, all engine internals, springs and struts, and CV joints...and everything still works on the car...I'm just gonna keep driving it until it dies...Nice have you had any repair bills?
What manufacturer is making a turbo engine without GDI these days?Motor oil has advanced by leaps & bounds since the old turbo days, as have inter cooling, cooldown timers, etc. I wouldn’t automatically discount a turbo engine’s longevity! Now, a CVT and GDI, those are a different story…
Ya this honda has maybe 5k left if it's luckyI don't care what anybody says, you add a turbo....more complexity and more likely to break down. Now you add the engine being smaller displacement AND turbo'd.....more stress on the mechanicals. Nope, won't last as long. Throw all thje modern engine oils at it you want.....won't make the motor go 295K miles.