Shockingly poor QC for AEM Dryflow

sds

Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
18
Location
MA
Speechless.
E5898FE1-49F0-4113-AFF7-7D9255DB0651.jpeg

850B50BA-E16F-4C1D-9198-012DE6748E8E.jpeg
C8ADF2B2-CF51-417A-8DD2-69A375A6E7E2.jpeg
B6ACC8A8-F1AB-4376-A451-EBD52909D2B8.jpeg
68BF844E-BD4C-4721-BD57-0C6B90D00527.jpeg
 
Things this bad get past QC because QC isn't looking. In all reality the thing will likely function perfectly.
It just looks sloppy.
I agree for the most part except for any loose bits located on the downstream side of the filter.
 
I won't make excuses for them but I'll tell you our reality in our automotive aftermarket plant in California. We are balls to the walls busy, largest backorders in our history. We have over 20 temps to hire at the moment and we still have openings for another 20 if we could get them. No one wants to work. It's hard to train people to jump right in no matter how simple you try to make it. We are struggling with QC too.
 
Some members here really dislike K&N air filters. Looking at older and newer threads suggests to me that those filters aren't made as well as they used to be. We have also discussed K&N oil filters being made cheaper overseas and suffering quality problems as a result.

So if K&N owns AEM, why wouldn't AEM have quality problems as well? Maybe the photos in the OP are typical now.
 
Back
Top