No, I got a load of bull. She "told" me that the way she was deciding the auction was by who bid "that amount" first. I explained that not only were auctions were decided by the last bid, not the first, and the result was that 4 people were all entitled to their one wheel, which is what I wanted.
It appears that she is a professional financial planner, and quite unable to follow the rules and conditions of the agreement she entered into.I believe she is also unable to accept the rights and assertions of others...one of "those" who TELLS people "how it is". Anyway, not to appear like a **** to my peers, but I feel that I've suffered a loss. She took payment and gave my item to another person. I could hang a pro-se civil suit on her for $100 and get the value of the wheel and tire (msrp, as far as I'm concerned) plus costs back. It's a binding contract! See, I'm, kind of mad too because of her attitude and her decieptfull assertion that the auction was NOT binding, quoting a section of EBay rules that pertatin to real estate and automobile (titled items) auction not being totally binding.
I just got a complaint through EBay about my last email to her...lol, no more abusive than anything I've written here. More of the attitude problem she has.
What does the groupe think?