Rotella T5 10w-30 + 1qt MMO

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Nov 7, 2010
Messages
842
Location
VA
My father has a 00 explorer with the 5.0 , no sludge but somewhat heavy varnish. I was thinking to use 4qts of Rotella T5 10w-30 and 1 qt of MMO to try to clean the motor out a little bit , what do you guys think of this combo in this motor?
 
Another thumbs up here! Great time of the year for using MMO with winter knocking at the door! It will help cold starts too, a win, win IMO.
 
Don't go for the Turbo-Laxative treatment with MMO. Put in a good HM oil like M1 5w30, and let it work over time. Even if the engine were heavily sludged, I wouldn't recommend trying to flush it out all at once.
 
MMO won't flush anything out all at once, it will gradually clean over the OCI. I'd run it about 3000 miles and then change back to your favorite oil and interval. If you're afraid, which you shouldn't be just add a pint for the last 1000 miles of the OCI. It isn't going to do as much cleaning but done over a few OCI's it should help. Keep in mind heavy varnish can be tough to remove so the 3000 mile interval I mentioned is your best shot at it. As you can see opinions vary, search the oil addiitive section for more.
 
What would be the final viscosity of 80% T5 10w30 and 20% MMO? At least run that calculation on Widman so you know a little about the brew you're putting in. Does anybody even know the KV40 and KV100 values for MMO?
 
Last edited:
KV40 and KV 100 values were posted I believe, and with a lucky search might be found. I do know MMO is a 5 grade oil, and 100% safe to use as "directed". Which I've done along with millions of others over decades with good results, and w/o issue. Also check the UOA section, wear numbers are usually very good, only TBN takes a hit. If you're cleaning an engine you don't want to do extended drains anyway.
 
Blackstone tested the KV100 of Marvel at 2.64. It will thin the oil for better flow and clean as well, but it doesn't seem to have as much effect on the base oils actual KV as you would expect. Marvel says you can run up to 15% Marvel and expect your base oil to stay in grade, for mixes exceeding that they suggest jumping up one grade. My first hand experience with Marvel in the crank seems to have been consistent with that statement. I have also seen a couple UOA's with Marvel added, and the oil was still in grade, when the calculator would have said it shouldn't have been. I speculate that since Marvel is a totally different base oil than PCMO/HDEO it may not have as much impact on the grade of the base oil as the calculator would indicate. Never the less I consider 10-15% Marvel about ideal, beyond that requires some re-evaluation of your base oil. I know the stuff works. I put a pint in my son's Chrysler the other day (4 1/2 qt sump) and he commented about the improved cold starts and he didn't remember I had put Marvel in until I told him again. I also experimented with a 15w40 in my Jeep and that was a mistake, a partial drain and a quart of Marvel cleared that up too. As far as cleaning, is is definitely a slow gradual cleaner, you'd not need to be concerned about the negatives of a "shock" type cleaner. I have tried to clean my Jeep with HDEO's alone and the oil stays golden, every time I add MMO regardless of where I am in the OCI the oil starts to darken considerably in about 400-500 miles. You can put a pint of MMO in about any sump and "forgettaboutit" IMO. A quart with a thick HDEO like T5 should be about perfect.
 
Originally Posted By: edhackett
I don't know why people insist on [censored] up a perfectly good oil like T5 by diluting it with MMO. Ed
1) Better cold cranking. 2) Improved UOA's (probably from better flow at start up resulting is less cold start wear). 3) Better cleaning. There's 3 reasons right there. But I'm not going to get into a MMO debate, I'm done. And I agree the T5 is awesome stuff all by itself, I'm as much of a Rotella nut as I am MMO.
 
Originally Posted By: KCJeep
1) Better cold cranking.
Then run a thinner oil or one with a higher VI.
Quote:
2) Improved UOA's (probably from better flow at start up resulting is less cold start wear).
How does one "improve" a UOA? Since they don't tell you much about engine wear.....
Quote:
3) Better cleaning.
Proof?
Quote:
There's 3 reasons right there. But I'm not going to get into a MMO debate, I'm done. And I agree the T5 is awesome stuff all by itself, I'm as much of a Rotella nut as I am MMO.
I'm going to say there are three opinions right there. Given the amount of money XOM and SOPUS have compared to a little company like the one that sells MMO you don't think its odd that if the product was in fact capable of living up to the mythological properties that people claim it has that they'd: A) Buy the company or B) Reverse engineer it and incorporate its obviously superior chemical make-up into their own products. It can't cost much to make given the price it sells for.
 
Originally Posted By: OVERK1LL
Given the amount of money XOM and SOPUS have compared to a little company like the one that sells MMO you don't think its odd that if the product was in fact capable of living up to the mythological properties that people claim it has that they'd: A) Buy the company or B) Reverse engineer it and incorporate its obviously superior chemical make-up into their own products. It can't cost much to make given the price it sells for.
Why? Maybe its a small specialized product that isn't profitable for them and/or they have no interest. They could just as easily buy Amsoil or Redline too, I guess they don't feel either company poses much or a threat or is a major player either. JMO
 
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: OVERK1LL
Given the amount of money XOM and SOPUS have compared to a little company like the one that sells MMO you don't think its odd that if the product was in fact capable of living up to the mythological properties that people claim it has that they'd: A) Buy the company or B) Reverse engineer it and incorporate its obviously superior chemical make-up into their own products. It can't cost much to make given the price it sells for.
Why? Maybe its a small specialized product that isn't profitable for them and/or they have no interest. They could just as easily buy Amsoil or Redline too, I guess they don't feel either company poses much or a threat or is a major player either. JMO
IMHO, I don't think Redline and Amsoil offer anything "groundbreaking" that any of the big players would want. They are boutique blenders catering to a specific market. Their products are not claimed to do anything from rebuild your engine in a single tank of gas to curing cancer like MMO is. Rather, they offer (expensive) oils that don't make sense to produce for companies like XOM or SOPUS. XOM makes plenty of Ester-based oils.... just not for automotive use. AMSOIL's market is super-extended drains. However, the claims regarding MMO, if the product actually did what people claim it did, would be of great interest for these companies. They could stop using pour point depressants, they would have a cheap detergent pack that is more effective than anything they have currently.....etc.
 
^^I never heard of MMO, rebuilding an engine in a single tank of gas or curing cancer. I have however seen how well it can clean up an engine, and heard it silence lifters, many others had similar experiences. For me its worth the cash if I need to clean up an engine or silence a lifter. I do agree with some of your comments regarding Amsoil, if XOM felt the company was a major player or super cutting edge they'd cut a check. But then again maybe they feel supplying them with raw materials is enough of a slice of the pie. Also as time goes by I am seriously considering trying Mobil 1 again. Castrol IMO dropped the ball with the change over to SN formulations, but that's another topic. Edit to add: MMO does float on water! LOL
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: JasonC
Why not use a Synthetic like Mobil 1 10w30 High Mileage and let it clean out slowly without using solvents?
While M1 HM 10w-30 is a fantastic oil , I dont want to use a HM oil. It is not leaking or consuming oil so I see no need for the HM oil.
 
Originally Posted By: Thax
My father has a 00 explorer with the 5.0 , no sludge but somewhat heavy varnish. I was thinking to use 4qts of Rotella T5 10w-30 and 1 qt of MMO to try to clean the motor out a little bit , what do you guys think of this combo in this motor?
The Rotella T5 is a good oil, but I see that you use Pennzoil Ultra, do you see a cleaning advantage with the Rotella.
 
Originally Posted By: Bayman
Originally Posted By: Thax
My father has a 00 explorer with the 5.0 , no sludge but somewhat heavy varnish. I was thinking to use 4qts of Rotella T5 10w-30 and 1 qt of MMO to try to clean the motor out a little bit , what do you guys think of this combo in this motor?
The Rotella T5 is a good oil, but I see that you use Pennzoil Ultra, do you see a cleaning advantage with the Rotella.
I use PU in my durango , my father does not want a syn in his crankcase and rotella is a very good cleaner. T5 is on the thick side for a 30 weight so adding 1qt of mmo should imho thin it down too a average viscosity 30 weight. The 5.0 has been backspeced by Ford to a 20 weight so im not concerned with going to thin , especially with winter around the corner.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top