Reliability of current Subaru STI

Not open for further replies.


Oct 23, 2005
Fredericksburg, VA
My wife is looking into buying one but I know there have been serious reliability issues with certain Subaru vehicles in recent years. Are the most recently sold STIs showing reliability problems?
She wants an STi? A bit high strung for a typical daily driver, isnt it?

Id be worried about the trans, clutch, transfer case and diffs, myself, then also about the cost of tires and braking system component replacements...
I like the new WRX. It's under $25k and outperforms last year's STI. The STI's are nice but the new ones have about a 10k premium over the regular WRX's.

Nice cars, but I am not familar enough with them to comment on reliablity.
The new WRX is the best buy but there isnt anything really unreliable about the STI either.
The reliability is excellent for the type of the car.

I would not worry about that factor. The car is a hoot to drive. I suggest trying a 09 WRX which in real world driving may even be better in performance. The STI advantage comes out on a track or snow/ice track.

My 2004 Subaru WRX wagon w/60k is flawless. The only culprit was a CV boot failure near the downpipe. Some people attribute to excess heat as that side is quite common to go.
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: BrianWC
What about just a new Impreza GT? Still decently fast...

Automatic Subaru, bleech.
Didn't realize it only came in auto. I passed up $19k on a SAAB 9-2x Aero b/c it was an auto. In hindsight, it would probably still have been a fun car...

What's funny is, one of the other reasons I skipped it was b/c my wife was sure it wouldn't be comfy for 2 kids in the back. Yet now I am driving around with 3 in the back of a Fit...
This year, the real deal is in the WRX. The STi became almost superfluous. $10K for 40hp? Not a deal. If you haven't ridden in one, the STi rides VERY stiff. The WRX is much better for daily commute duty.
2009 WRX is a great car. Best bang for the buck when compared to the STI. Also the STI has a stiffer spring setup than the WRX so you may want to take both out for a test drive to compare.

I owned a 2002 WRX up until recently (as per my signature). I bought it brand new and traded it with about 97,000 miles on it. Overall very reliable car. Outside of normal maintenance items I did have to get the water pump changed and something went wacky with the anti-lock brakes where they became "hyper-active" and would basically kick in even on normal stops. I also needed to have a valve cover gasket replaced, 02 sensor went bad around 85k and the dealer needed to fix a fuel leak issue that would occur in the cold weather. This issue really only affected the 2002-2004 cars I believe. Anyway, those issues were fixed and the car ran strong for the entire time I owned it. Mine was a 5-spd and I was still on the original clutch as well. Also the car ran very smooth, very little buzziness to the boxer engine even at high rpms. Very smooth idle as well. That turbo sounded great when it spooled up.

I have heard of random Subies suffering from spun bearing issues from time to time. It's rare but it does happen, you can find examples on YouTube. Also the boxer engine does have a tendency to develop a piston slap noise due to the design of the pistons when the engine is cold. Dealers know about it and basically consider it normal unless the noise is still present when the engine is hot.

Before I bought my G8, I did look at a Legacy 2.5GT Limited. I just couldn't find one around with the manual trans in a color I liked at the time or else I might have bought that instead.

Ed B.
Not open for further replies.