Originally Posted By: Artem
Originally Posted By: SR5
Nice dose of Moly at about 200 ppm, but I too was also expecting the TBN of 2.1 to be a bit higher after only ~ 5200 miles.
Certainly the iron wear at 5 ppm is great.
I also expected better results in regards to TBN after only 6 months and 5k miles. This was the first time QSUD went into the block, so perhaps it was cleaning things up from prior oils / deposits and TBN took a hit? The car was purchased used with 116,000 miles or so with unknown prior service history but looks relatively clean through the filler hole.
Originally Posted By: 4WD
QSUD is $20/5 quart oil … and is not made/marketed for long OCI, is it?
5k-7k for that price point? Good oil if you are OK changing about then.
Regardless of the price (although $20 seems like a lot by my oil clearance prices) any oil labeled Full Synthetic should be able to do 10k AT A MINIMUM with TBN to spare. I don't think that's too much to ask.
If Quaker States BEST Ultimate class of synthetic is practically calling it quits after only 5k miles, I'm scared to know how their cheapest regular conventional oil would have looked in this engine after the same interval.
You bought it not me … why would Shell make something that out performs Shell …and they don’t even market PP as long OCI (why don’t we have a ton of 10k~15k+ PP users here) … was it Son of Joe who wrote a post on TBN being derived in different ways … (it’s a number we all hope is relative, but is it)
Too much calcium for a number of today’s engines anyway …