Looking again at that sheet, it's probably within regulations, given when it was done up. I think they've got somewhere around two years use out of the ACEA stuff (and look how late the last revisions came out; there was a big, big delay), so that looks all in order, despite it looking like someone just mashed the keyboard with the palm of their hand when typing the ACEA portion. Half of that gibberish could be deleted, more in fact. Put A5/B5 and be done with it. A5/B5 2012 were current for that sheet date, so no need to add extraneous, irrelevant information.
There are probably at least a hundred people on BITOG who could do a better job with data sheets and would do it for free, just to have the privilege of seeing the information. Yet, oil companies pay staffers to come up with some of this tripe?