quote:
Originally posted by Dr. T:
Jerry, Motorbike's experience shadows my own. Read my post on "0-20/fuel economy post you started". You state that you had no difference in f. economy and Motorbike's was 21%.
Your observation mimmics those posters from Australia that say they don't notice a difference either except that the engine sounds like a box of marbles. The difference as I have too noted is as Motorbike describes and I have posted this observation well over a year ago is that on an engine that has had a steady diet of 30 weight for eg. for many thou's of miles and then a 50 weight is used, fuel economy will pummel.
Like when I had the ever-diminishing engine performance from 30 weight synthetic and first put in M-1 15-50...it was like I lost half the engine along with half the fuel economy to boot. My guess is that all the varnish/gummed up garbage from years/thou's of mi. of thin oil use resulted in constrictions which were then non-condusive to a thicker viscosity. This may be why some are confused and make statements like "thick oils suck". Well, yeah...they do when all your engine knows is 5-30.
So, I have concluded that to these nay-sayers to first clean out the garbage with auto-rx or similar before moving to such thicker viscosities. Otherwise, move up gradually or use diesel/ester-base oils (eg. Delvac or Redline) to clean things out first.
And IMO the cleanup "could take" just as many miles as it took to lay down the crap in the first play. ie. it's a beehatch to get things clean. That's why it's smarter to keep things clean in the first place. 3k OCI's or heavier weight synth. concurrent with extended OCI based on UOA's as a guide.