No explanation = fakery
"No fuel" engine video
- Thread starter Pablo
- Start date
Burns hydrogen? Condensing the exhaust back into water and then separating the hydrogen to combust again?
What's in the red tank above the engine? Gasoline?
What's in the red tank above the engine? Gasoline?
Read the comments at YouTube. Good questions. I have little idea, but, I think it's a scam.
It’s an age-old scam repackaged yet again.
A bit of thermodynamics understanding goes a long ways here.
A bit of thermodynamics understanding goes a long ways here.
Wow if anyone is looking for pure entertainment GOLD.. GO read the comments!
Converts water to hydrogen? With what energy?
This video and the comments do demonstrate one thing; we need to bring basic physics and not so basic economics back into all high school curricula.....
Its the Stanley Meyer water car, without the water.
My understanding is that the generator uses liquid fuel (gas or diesel) to "start the process".
Of course that does not count.
The hardest thing about a perpetual motion machine, is hiding the battery.
Look at the water car, or the 100 mpg carburetor. These are hardly new. People believe what they want and have for a very long time. Either that or we didn't teach economics or physics in the 50's either.
I feel there are more.....believers....now.
That is exactly.....well one reason I posted this is the first place.
I blame AI because I AI'd it and AI'd said so. Isn't AI great?!
Which isn’t thermodynamically viable either.
It reminds me of the one guy who posted a storm about the Clem engine on here. At some point it stops being ignorance and becomes stupidity.
would that be due to the amount of power needed to convert water to hydrogen?
No, not the amount of energy in and of itself. More like the constraints of the second law of thermodynamics.
Similar threads
- Locked
