New updated GC data here and VOA

Status
Not open for further replies.
Try it with some salad leaves and a spoonful of creamy hummus.
tongue.gif
 
quote:

Originally posted by Pablo:
I think some proof is rolling in with UOA's of the gold.

One thing for sure, P. Scholte will need to re-dye his green lederhosen.


Pablo,

I thought I told you to stay out of my closet!
wink.gif
 
quote:

Originally posted by Triple_Se7en:
Well.....

There's been one report of lower TBN. Another report saying it's the same TBN.


Are you reffering to Bruce's initial report on the Gold GC showing a much lower TBN compared to the Green GC?

Here's what Bruce had to say on that one:
"The Gold M05 was posted earlier with a LOW TBN due to not enough sample so now is retested and looks good."
 
quote:

Originally posted by Quattro Pete:

quote:

Originally posted by Winston:
Don't you all find it kind of hard to like an oil without any Moly, Boron or Antimony?

That's nothing. But the lack of gummibear smell makes it really hard to like.
smile.gif


but why no Moly?? it does worry me.
 
quote:

Originally posted by sky jumper:

quote:

Originally posted by Quattro Pete:

quote:

Originally posted by Winston:
Don't you all find it kind of hard to like an oil without any Moly, Boron or Antimony?

That's nothing. But the lack of gummibear smell makes it really hard to like.
smile.gif


but why no Moly?? it does worry me.


Why does it worry you since it generates excellent UOA wear numbers?
 
quote:

Originally posted by sky jumper:
for the same reason most of us prefer grp IV/V over grp III - peace of mind.

But isn't seeing extremely low wear on oil analysis reports more than enough to give you peace of mind? I know it is for me!
 
That's what I mean. I saw that but I cannot deduct anything from there that would indicate what its base is. Call me stupid (OK, you're stupid), but I need someone to point out the factor there that says it is PAO/Ester based still. TIA>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top