This is something I've been noticing for a while, and I just don't understand it, and its driving me nuts!
We can all agree that with the advent of new API specs for oil, ie. SJ-SL-SM, that oil get 'better' - it last longer, keeps engines cleaner..etc. But one this I have noticed is that as this march forward is progressing, the cold-cranking specs of most oils are geeting much worse! I don't necessarily have the prooof for all these, but I do have enough examples to show a trend:
SL Pennzoil 5W-30= 4400cst @-30
SM Pennzoil 5W-30= 5800cst @-30
SL/SM Kendall GT-1 5W-30= 5300cst @-30
"Newest" SM Kendall GT-1= 6200cst @-30 (!)
SL Ultramar Synthetic 5W-30= 3700cst @-30
SM Ultramar Synthetic 5W-30= 4900cst @-30 (!)
SL/SM Valvoline AC 5W-30= 5000cst @-30
SM Valvoline 'Premium' 5W-30= 5531cst @-30
The reason I think for this change is that as oil manufacturers have to make oil that is tougher against volatility, they have to use slightly thicker basestocks, and reduce the 'spread' of the oil, while keeping it within the API guidelines.
I'm also aware that as basestocks and add packs get better, oils protect better, so have really low cold crank numbers isn't AS important. Finally, I'm also aware that the differences between a lot of these numbers is moot, and in most scenarios no-one can tell the difference between a '4400 cst oil' and a '5800 cst oil'.
But it still bugs me...seems like progress in the wrong way...any thoughts?
Roger
We can all agree that with the advent of new API specs for oil, ie. SJ-SL-SM, that oil get 'better' - it last longer, keeps engines cleaner..etc. But one this I have noticed is that as this march forward is progressing, the cold-cranking specs of most oils are geeting much worse! I don't necessarily have the prooof for all these, but I do have enough examples to show a trend:
SL Pennzoil 5W-30= 4400cst @-30
SM Pennzoil 5W-30= 5800cst @-30
SL/SM Kendall GT-1 5W-30= 5300cst @-30
"Newest" SM Kendall GT-1= 6200cst @-30 (!)
SL Ultramar Synthetic 5W-30= 3700cst @-30
SM Ultramar Synthetic 5W-30= 4900cst @-30 (!)
SL/SM Valvoline AC 5W-30= 5000cst @-30
SM Valvoline 'Premium' 5W-30= 5531cst @-30
The reason I think for this change is that as oil manufacturers have to make oil that is tougher against volatility, they have to use slightly thicker basestocks, and reduce the 'spread' of the oil, while keeping it within the API guidelines.
I'm also aware that as basestocks and add packs get better, oils protect better, so have really low cold crank numbers isn't AS important. Finally, I'm also aware that the differences between a lot of these numbers is moot, and in most scenarios no-one can tell the difference between a '4400 cst oil' and a '5800 cst oil'.
But it still bugs me...seems like progress in the wrong way...any thoughts?
Roger