NeoCon Richard Perle calls Powell a Wuss

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
206
Location
San Clemente, CA
What happens when you have civilian ideologues in charge of the DoD?

In discussing the Iraq war, both Clancy and Zinni singled out the Department of Defense for criticism. Clancy recalled a prewar encounter in Washington during which he "almost came to blows" with Richard Perle, a Pentagon adviser at the time and a longtime advocate of the invasion.

"He was saying how (Secretary of State) Colin Powell was being a wuss because he was overly concerned with the lives of the troops," Clancy said. "And I said, 'Look ..., he's supposed to think that way!' And Perle didn't agree with me on that. People like that worry me."



Complete article:

Zinni, Clancy Team Up for Iraq War Criticism

Tuesday, May 25, 2004

NEW YORK — A brand name author with many admirers in the military criticized the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, citing it as proof that "good men make mistakes."

That same writer said he almost "came to blows" with a leading war supporter, former Pentagon adviser Richard Perle (search).

The author is Tom Clancy (search).

The hawkish master of such million-selling thrillers as "Patriot Games" and "The Hunt for Red October" now finds himself adding to the criticism of the Iraq war, and not only through his own comments.

His latest book, "Battle Ready," is a collaboration with another war critic, retired Marine Gen. Anthony C. Zinni (search). "Battle Ready" looks at Zinni's long military career, dating back to the Vietnam War, and includes harsh remarks by Zinni about the current conflict.

In an interview Monday with The Associated Press, Clancy and Zinni sat side by side in a hotel conference room in midtown Manhattan, mutual admirers who said they agreed on most issues, despite "one or two" spirited "discussions" during the book's planning.

Zinni has openly attacked the war, but Clancy reluctantly acknowledged his own concerns. He declined repeatedly to comment on the war, before saying that it lacked a "casus belli," or suitable provocation.

"It troubles me greatly to say that, because I've met President Bush," Clancy said. "He's a good guy. ... I think he's well-grounded, both morally and philosophically. But good men make mistakes."

"Battle Ready" was published Monday with a first printing of 438,700. It is the fourth in Clancy's "Commanders" series, in which military leaders reflect on their careers and discuss military strategy.

"In the movies, military leaders are all drunken Nazis," said Clancy, who has worked on books about retired Gen. Chuck Horner, who led U.S. Central Command Air Forces during the Gulf War, and retired Gen. Carl Stiner, whose missions included the capture of Panama leader Manuel Noriega.

"In fact, these are very bright people who regard the soldiers and Marines under them as their own kids. I thought the people needed to know about that. These are good guys, and smart guys."

While the 57-year-old Clancy is tall and thin, with bony arms and round, sunken eyes, the 60-year-old Zinni has the short, stocky build of an ex-Marine. He served as commander in chief of the U.S. Central Command from 1997 to 2000 and as a special Middle East envoy from 2001-2003.

But even as an envoy, Zinni spoke out against invading Iraq, regarding it as disastrous for Middle East peace and a distraction from the war against terrorism. On Monday, he said getting rid of Saddam Hussein was not worth the price.

"He's a bad guy. He's a terrible guy and he should go," Zinni said. "But I don't think it's worth 800 troops dead, 4,500 wounded — some of them terribly — $200 billion of our treasury and counting, and our reputation and our image in the world, particularly in that region, shattered."

In discussing the Iraq war, both Clancy and Zinni singled out the Department of Defense for criticism. Clancy recalled a prewar encounter in Washington during which he "almost came to blows" with Richard Perle, a Pentagon adviser at the time and a longtime advocate of the invasion.

"He was saying how (Secretary of State) Colin Powell was being a wuss because he was overly concerned with the lives of the troops," Clancy said. "And I said, 'Look ..., he's supposed to think that way!' And Perle didn't agree with me on that. People like that worry me."

Both Clancy and Zinni praised President Bush but would not commit to voting for him. Clancy said that voting for Sen. John Kerry, the Democrats' presumptive nominee, would be "a stretch for me," but wouldn't say that he was supporting Bush.

Zinni, a registered Republican who voted for Bush in 2000, said he could not support the president's re-election "if the current strategists in the defense department are going to be carried over."

Zinni makes a point of answering all questions, just as he prides himself on speaking out against Iraq. He called it a lesson learned from Vietnam, when "we were all imprinted with the idea that we can't let this come about again."

Clancy, meanwhile, was more close-mouthed, and not only about his views on Iraq. When asked what Jack Ryan, the fictional hero of "Patriot Games" and other Clancy novels, would have thought of the war, the author offered an enigmatic smile.

"I don't like to comment on works in progress," he said.

SOURCE: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120823,00.html
 
Richard Perle is an @sshole and should be sent to Iraq to fight, that ******* prick. This administration better get rid of these right wing, neo-con @ssholes who are acting on ideology that doesn't jive with mainstream America.

Is it true Bush said he was called to be president or go to war with Iraq by god? Someone please tell me he didn't say that.
dunno.gif


[ June 11, 2004, 05:00 PM: Message edited by: buster ]
 
I can't confirm he has said those things in a straight-on direct way, but he has very definitely said both of them in an elliptical way.

Just Google for Bush and God and you should easily get all the proof you need.

[ June 11, 2004, 05:49 PM: Message edited by: TooManyWheels ]
 
buster,
those quotes were a translation back to english, from a translation into arabic of an interview.

There's a lot of scope for a mistranslation. (Take an article, Babelfish it into French, and then back into English as an example).

I think that the statements should be either confirmed or denied by the Whitehouse, along with those (much older) statements about athiests being neither citizens or patriots.
 
I used to read Tom Clancy until they interviewed him live right after 9/11, the same day I think. He was yelling at another guest "you don't know that they were pilots" like the guy was an idiot to suggest the ridiculous notion that trained pilots had taken over the planes. Clancy was basically rabid. Well guess what.

I have not been able to pick up another Clancy book since.
 
Some info on the NeoCon personalities from the Christian Science Monitor...

Paul Wolfowitz: As Deputy Secretary of Defense, Mr. Wolfowitz is #2 at the Pentagon and a key architect of the war in Iraq. From '89-'93, Wolfowitz served as Under Secretary of Defense for Policy in charge of a 700-person team that had major responsibilities for the reshaping of military strategy and policy at the end of the cold war. In this capacity Wolfowitz co-wrote with Lewis "Scooter" Libby the '92 draft "Defense Planning Guidance" which called for US military dominance over Eurasia and preemptive strikes against countries suspected of developing WMD. After being leaked, the draft proved so shocking that it had to be substantially rewritten. After 9/11, many of the principles in that draft became key points in the 2002 National Security Strategy of the US. During the '91 Gulf War, Wolfowitz advocated extending the war's aim to include toppling Saddam Hussein's regime.


Richard Perle: Famously nicknamed the "Prince of Darkness" for his hardline stance on national security issues, Mr. Perle is one of the most high-profile neo-conservatives. He resigned in March, 2003 as chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board after being criticized for conflicts of interest. From '81-'87 he was Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy. Perle is chief architect of the "creative destruction" agenda to reshape the Middle East, starting with the invasion of Iraq. He outlined parts of this agenda in a key '96 report for Israel's right-wing Likud Party called "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm." Perle helped establish two think-tanks: The Center for Security Policy and the Jewish Institute for National Security. He is also a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, an advisor for the counter-terrorist think-tank Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, and a director of The Jerusalem Post.

Douglas Feith: As Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Mr. Feith is the No.3 civilian at the Pentagon after Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz. Feith served in the Reagan administration as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Negotiations Policy. Prior to that, he served as Special Counsel to Richard Perle. Before his service at the Pentagon, Feith worked as a Middle East specialist for the National Security Council in '81-'82. Feith is well-known for his support of Israel's right-wing Likud Party. In '97, Douglas Feith was honored along with his father Dalck Feith, who was active in a Zionist youth movement in his native Poland, for their "service to Israel and the Jewish people" by the pro-Likud Zionist Organization of America at its 100th anniversary banquet. In '92, he was Vice President of the advisory board of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs. Mr. Feith is a former chairman and currently a director of the Center for Security Policy.

Other NeoCons and their influence: http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/neocon/index.html

[ June 11, 2004, 07:58 PM: Message edited by: Bugzii ]
 
quote:

Originally posted by buster:
Is it true Bush said he was called to be president or go to war with Iraq by god? Someone please tell me he didn't say that.
dunno.gif


I saw a Frontline piece called "The Jesus Factor". It was quite interesting.

Here's the link: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/jesus/etc/synopsis.html

Excerpt:
quote:

On the day that George W. Bush was sworn into his second term as governor of Texas, friend and adviser Dr. Richard Land recalls Bush making an unexpected pronouncement.

"The day he was inaugurated there were several of us who met with him at the governor's mansion," says Land, president of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission. "And among the things he said to us was, 'I believe that God wants me to be president.'"

How George W. Bush became a born-again Christian -- and the impact that decision has had on his political career -- is the focus of FRONTLINE's report, "The Jesus Factor." Through interviews with Bush family friends, advisers, political analysts, and observers -- as well as excerpts from the president's speeches, interviews, and debates -- this one-hour documentary chronicles George W. Bush's personal religious journey while also examining the growing political influence of the nation's more than 70 million evangelical Christians.


 
It wouldn't necessary make you a bad person, but definitely a rich person.

Though you can't take a nation to war with $100 mil.
grin.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top