Exactly.I’m not tracking my car or anything.
Nah, they bite better and stop more consistently in all conditions. There's a reason the Germans use them.Exactly.
The majority of folks purchasing these cars use them as commuters...the auto trans is a pretty good indicator.
No need to use an aggressive pad that's only benefit is to make a mess of the wheels.
Last time I checked, this isn't Germany.Nah, they bite better and stop more consistently in all conditions. There's a reason the Germans use them.
Yeah, that’s why there are so many cars with clean wheels that have **** for cold and wet brake bite.Last time I checked, this isn't Germany.
So you're going to toss your high-performing OE pads for some $20-$30 chinese brake pads in hopes of not washing your wheels as often.Just thought I would update this:
I am going to install Raybestos element 3 ceramic brake pads. FF rating.
I've used a lot of brake pads and I thought the EHT were pretty good actually. They have a lot more bite than many other low dust pads. For example, I replaced Hawk HPS 5.0 with Raybestos EHT on my Mazda and they actually have much better initial bite.So you're going to toss your high-performing OE pads for some $20-$30 chinese brake pads in hopes of not washing your wheels as often.
Brilliant.
Shopping for pads based on those friction ratings alone, is akin to shopping for tires using UTQG ratings.
Yeah, was trying to find compromise between ceramic and semi metallic. I had a hard time spending more money for akebonos, which are said to have inferior feel. I wasn’t shopping based on friction rating, just stating what they are.I've used a lot of brake pads and I thought the EHT were pretty good actually. They have a lot more bite than many other low dust pads. For example, I replaced Hawk HPS 5.0 with Raybestos EHT on my Mazda and they actually have much better initial bite.
Some BMWs have really over-assisted brakes so I wouldn't be opposed to using them depending on the car.