Can you recommend one ? My computer is just used for browsing .The choice of SSD has no relation to how much RAM you have, you'd be replacing your boot hard drive with the SSD.
for system info, from a terminal, sudo lshw -short
Can you recommend one ? My computer is just used for browsing .The choice of SSD has no relation to how much RAM you have, you'd be replacing your boot hard drive with the SSD.
for system info, from a terminal, sudo lshw -short
I've deployed about 100 or so of the Kingston KC600 ones in the last while, they are good and I can readily recommend.Can you recommend one ? My computer is just used for browsing .
Which one. I came up with several different ones. Internal or ExternalI've deployed about 100 or so of the Kingston KC600 ones in the last while, they are good and I can readily recommend.
Assuming your current drive is SATA, which it should be, given the age of the system, and it won't have an option for PCIe. mSATA or other formats, you'd be going with this one (scroll down, you'll see which I have selected):Which one. I came up with several different ones. Internal or External
Amazon.com : kingston kc600 ssd
www.amazon.com
This is what OverKill is suggesting.Which one. I came up with several different ones. Internal or External
Amazon.com : kingston kc600 ssd
www.amazon.com
Yup, that's the one.
I would never buy a Windows computer with just 8Gb of memory. 12 min. That much I am sure of.
Would this be a decent buy?
Thanks, i'll keep looking around.I would never buy a Windows computer with just 8Gb of memory. 12 min. That much I am sure of.
As far as the rest of the machine, to me it looks like a budget do everything machine at a low price that most likely you will be frustrated with over time. But that is just me and Im no longer up to date on Windows machines but I would think you would need to find a good computer on sale for $600 without the monitor, just looks budget all the way down to the processor.
Years ago we had a bad experience with a cheap Lenovo and returned it, the new computer was way slower than the one we were replacing! BUT the good news is, If you dont like it, you can return it to Best Buy.
Im sure more experienced Windows people will chime in ...
I'd have to agree. Here at work (University) we don't even let departments buy anything without an SSD, i-5 or better, and 16GB or more of RAM. 32GB of RAM is preferred for research machines. The reasoning for this is besides Win 10 running so much crap in the background, the university also has a lot of stuff running, so 8GB just isn't enough. SSD is mandatory or you will need to boot up your machine the night before.I would never buy a Windows computer with just 8Gb of memory. 12 min. That much I am sure of.
As far as the rest of the machine, to me it looks like a budget do everything machine at a low price that most likely you will be frustrated with over time. But that is just me and Im no longer up to date on Windows machines but I would think you would need to find a good computer on sale for $600 without the monitor, just looks budget all the way down to the processor.
Years ago we had a bad experience with a cheap Lenovo and returned it, the new computer was way slower than the one we were replacing! BUT the good news is, If you dont like it, you can return it to Best Buy.
Im sure more experienced Windows people will chime in ...
Your current Intel CPU is faster than that AMD.
Would this be a decent buy?
8GB is just fine for day to day work, heck a lot of the clinic machines I support went from 7 to 10 and only have 4GB. The biggest improvement in their performance was the swapping of the spinning disk for an SSD, upgrading the RAM had VERY little impact on the couple I tried it on before just going ahead with SSD's for all of them.I would never buy a Windows computer with just 8Gb of memory. 12 min. That much I am sure of.
As far as the rest of the machine, to me it looks like a budget do everything machine at a low price that most likely you will be frustrated with over time. But that is just me and Im no longer up to date on Windows machines but I would think you would need to find a good computer on sale for $600 without the monitor, just looks budget all the way down to the processor.
Years ago we had a bad experience with a cheap Lenovo and returned it, the new computer was way slower than the one we were replacing! BUT the good news is, If you dont like it, you can return it to Best Buy.
Im sure more experienced Windows people will chime in ...
Agreed. My MacBook Pro has 8gb of RAM, only had an issue and got a warning about low memory when hammering the RAM with GarageBand, but I was using 100+MB to gigabyte or 2 .wav sound files before processing it to high quality mp3 to send to the radio station. Just browsing the web and watching YouTube 8gb is more than enough, worst I’ve seen was ~5gb of usage.8GB is just fine for day to day work, heck a lot of the clinic machines I support went from 7 to 10 and only have 4GB. The biggest improvement in their performance was the swapping of the spinning disk for an SSD, upgrading the RAM had VERY little impact on the couple I tried it on before just going ahead with SSD's for all of them.
For heavier workloads? Yes, more RAM is beneficial. My Mac Pro has 32GB (may upgrade it further now, since the option exists) and my Macbook Pro 16GB. Next MBP will have 32GB at least. But I game, run VM's....etc. Somebody surfing the web and doing e-mail isn't going to see the benefit of 32GB or likely even 16.
I wanted to indulge myself, so I went for 128GB. I got it when RAM was cheap. It's only DDR4 3200, but it's great to have. Now I dream of 256GB and running my VM's in RAM, lol. Of course, most people don't need this much RAM, but it's always comforting to have.8GB is just fine for day to day work
Is this the type of SSD I need ?It is a 3 channel DDR3 as supposed to dual channel so you need 2GBx6 or 4GBx3 for 12GB of 6x1GB for 6GB Ram.