Mower engine class action settlement

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 30, 2002
Messages
42,799
Location
Great Lakes
Hopefully not a repost... just got my notification in the mail. Lots of popular manufacturers included... sued and settled with regards to misrepresentation and overstating the horsepower of the engines.

Qualified purchase dates: from 1/1994 to 4/12/2010, so technically you could go out and buy a mower tomorrow and still get settlement money for it - up to $35 for walk-behind mowers; up to $75 for riding mowers. You can file your claim here:

https://lawnmowerclass.com/
 
I got my postcard today, too.

Wanna bet when the dust settles all we'll get is $3.42 and an increased cost the next time we buy a mower? Yes, I'm still bitter at the shafting I got with the ADM Stock class-action settlement....
48.gif
 
Originally Posted By: opus1
Wanna bet when the dust settles all we'll get is $3.42 and an increased cost the next time we buy a mower?

Yeah, figures...
 
Originally Posted By: opus1
Wanna bet when the dust settles all we'll get is $3.42 and an increased cost the next time we buy a mower?


A short-dated coupon for $3.42 would be more like it...
 
Originally Posted By: OilNerd
Originally Posted By: opus1
Wanna bet when the dust settles all we'll get is $3.42 and an increased cost the next time we buy a mower?


A short-dated coupon for $3.42 would be more like it...
Ah, yes, good catch.

I was part of a class-action with a former big-box store I worked at, and when the dust settled I got a store credit for something like $10, and then I got a W-2 for that amount which I had to declare on my taxes.
 
I always got a seperate engine manual with my mowers explaining how the HP was tested, elevation it was tested at, etc.....ie: tested in a lab with no load before being installed on the final product....ie mower, blower, water pump etc. I get that they just male the engine and have little control over what it ends up on, and don't really see this as "fraud". I am fine with that, these cheap mowers I picked up over the years did the job just fine, and more HP means more $$, which is also fine with me, I could care less what the rating was as long as it cut grass and didn't blow up. I can't really say I have suffered any "damages" due to the overstated HP ratings on cheap mowers I bought. In fact, I will likely suffer more "damages" buying future cheap mowers as a result of this stupid lawsuit.

Definately some dishonesty going on, but it seems more directed at the EPA then the consumer.....
Quote:
Defendants knowingly advertise, market and sell identical engines with varying horsepower ratings and labels, thereby representing (directly and by implication) that these identical engines are different. In fact, these engines are identical on the basis of horsepower. Defendants sell these identical, but differently and misleadingly labeled, engines at different prices—with higher prices for engines falsely labeled with purported higher horsepower. Defendants thereby represent that the products are different when they are not but, rather, contain identical engines.
89. For example, Tecumseh reported to the EPA that its LV195 lawn mower engine produces 3.67 horsepower, yet Tecumseh represented to the consuming public, including to Plaintiff, on labels and elsewhere, that the LV195 engine produces 6.75 horsepower. This is an overstatement of approximately 84%.
90. Similarly, Briggs & Stratton reported to the EPA that its Model 125k lawn mower engine produces 3.6 horsepower, yet Briggs & Stratton represented to the consuming public, including Plaintiff, that its Model 125k engine produces 6.75 horsepower. This is an overstatement of about 88%.
 
Originally Posted By: Hitzy
I always got a seperate engine manual with my mowers explaining how the HP was tested, elevation it was tested at, etc.....ie: tested in a lab with no load before being installed on the final product....ie mower, blower, water pump etc. I get that they just male the engine and have little control over what it ends up on, and don't really see this as "fraud". I am fine with that, these cheap mowers I picked up over the years did the job just fine, and more HP means more $$, which is also fine with me, I could care less what the rating was as long as it cut grass and didn't blow up. I can't really say I have suffered any "damages" due to the overstated HP ratings on cheap mowers I bought. In fact, I will likely suffer more "damages" buying future cheap mowers as a result of this stupid lawsuit.

Definately some dishonesty going on, but it seems more directed at the EPA then the consumer.....
Quote:
Defendants knowingly advertise, market and sell identical engines with varying horsepower ratings and labels, thereby representing (directly and by implication) that these identical engines are different. In fact, these engines are identical on the basis of horsepower. Defendants sell these identical, but differently and misleadingly labeled, engines at different prices—with higher prices for engines falsely labeled with purported higher horsepower. Defendants thereby represent that the products are different when they are not but, rather, contain identical engines.
89. For example, Tecumseh reported to the EPA that its LV195 lawn mower engine produces 3.67 horsepower, yet Tecumseh represented to the consuming public, including to Plaintiff, on labels and elsewhere, that the LV195 engine produces 6.75 horsepower. This is an overstatement of approximately 84%.
90. Similarly, Briggs & Stratton reported to the EPA that its Model 125k lawn mower engine produces 3.6 horsepower, yet Briggs & Stratton represented to the consuming public, including Plaintiff, that its Model 125k engine produces 6.75 horsepower. This is an overstatement of about 88%.



Their argument will be that the manual wasn't printed in every language known to man and their wasn't a red blinking light and safety lever that you have to depress before starting to prove that you read the manual.

I agree. All this will do is make a bunch of lawyers rich and make engines cost more.
 
What a bunch of bull. My grandpa got one of these. what a waste of postage, paper, and the usps delievering them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom