Nuclear obviously... With the of advance technology today and security systems is the best choice...If you had your choice what would you like more of in order of preference?
For me it would be:
Nuclear
NG
Coal
Nuclear obviously... With the of advance technology today and security systems is the best choice...If you had your choice what would you like more of in order of preference?
For me it would be:
Nuclear
NG
Coal
This.Nuclear is the best option. If either of the accidents that happened not had humans interfere with things, neither would have occured.
I keep thinking we are going to hit a wall on mineral mining - either by who controls it - or once folks realize it might just be extreme surface extraction - so I lean towards mobile batteries and not fixed batteries …Nuke
Hydro/Wind/Solar
And the third choice should be figuring out the storage of off-peak for on-peak usage.
-- Pump water uphill for later reuse through turbines
-- Run fridge and AC compressors off peak, storing the cold to thaw later in the day
-- Have intelligent interruptible charging of cars and whatnot. The solid state batteries coming out that hold a weeks worth will be great for this.
Only after all this, start burning fuels.
That's changing btw.Europe has it figured out. Just burn wood!
Maybe you can tell this drives me crazy.
Companies HERE cutting down trees, heating it, shredding it, turning it into pellets, drying them, then shipping them overseas!
They get a pass because the fuel source is CARBON NEUTRAL!
What a JOKE.
Sorry for the rant.
NGIf you had your choice what would you like more of in order of preference?
For me it would be:
Nuclear
NG
Coal
Im all for the Nuclear, nothing is more clean from any source of 24 hour electricity.I'd like to see more Nuclear and Coal. We have so much coal it would be a pity to not use it.
Texas failure is poor power grid design.Hydro power isn't working out so great for China or the SW USA these days.
Wind and solar failed us Texans in Feb 2021
Ukraine is fixin to have a nuke power plant blown of the map
Do the math
This.
Come up with an inexpensive, effective, easy way to separate hydrogen AND compress it, and sure, it will work.For typical residential and commercial electricity, nuclear is the choice by far in so many ways. For transporation in the long term, I believe hydrogen fuel cell vehicles will eventually take the lead.
Come up with an inexpensive, effective, easy way to separate hydrogen AND compress it, and sure, it will work.
The BEST case for fossil fuels.The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels.......
You don't need an MSR to use thorium, and you don't need one to eliminate the waste (hence breeder reactors). MSR has its own suite of challenges, mostly related to the molten salt component. Water is much easier to work with (which shouldn't be surprising). The salts can be extremely corrosive and have a significant impact on component longevity and reliability.China is readying its first MSR Thorium reactor, we gave up on it early 70’s
https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Chinese-molten-salt-reactor-cleared-for-start-up
The ultimate in safety and efficiency is coming soon.
Also almost completely solves the waste issue as you get 99% less waste and said waste is much more “potent” making it easier to reuse in passive applications.
How did human interference cause the Fukushima nuclear disaster??Nuclear is the best option. If either of the accidents that happened not had humans interfere with things, neither would have occured.
“Hey, you should probably move those back up generators.”How did human interference cause the Fukushima nuclear disaster??
That wasn't human interference. It was failure to anticipate conditions. Nothing designed by man anticipates what man does not anticipate. When it comes to engineering decisions on matters that have almost zero probability, but vast destruction if the accident occurs, humans often "do not compute". Particularly if making everything totally bullet proof makes the entire project uneconomic.“Hey, you should probably move those back up generators.”
“Lol okay, but we won’t”