More Nuclear, Coal or Natural gas power?

Nuke
Hydro/Wind/Solar

And the third choice should be figuring out the storage of off-peak for on-peak usage.

-- Pump water uphill for later reuse through turbines
-- Run fridge and AC compressors off peak, storing the cold to thaw later in the day
-- Have intelligent interruptible charging of cars and whatnot. The solid state batteries coming out that hold a weeks worth will be great for this.

Only after all this, start burning fuels.
I keep thinking we are going to hit a wall on mineral mining - either by who controls it - or once folks realize it might just be extreme surface extraction - so I lean towards mobile batteries and not fixed batteries …
 
Europe has it figured out. Just burn wood!
Maybe you can tell this drives me crazy.

Companies HERE cutting down trees, heating it, shredding it, turning it into pellets, drying them, then shipping them overseas!
They get a pass because the fuel source is CARBON NEUTRAL!
What a JOKE.🤬

Sorry for the rant.
That's changing btw.
 
If you had your choice what would you like more of in order of preference?

For me it would be:
Nuclear
NG
Coal
NG
Coal.
Nuclear


Capital costs are so low for NG/Coal compared to Nuclear. This is important because in my ideal world I'd have solar and I don't want those who don't have solar to have to pay a lot more $$ for maintaining a fleet of nukes.

In the US at least nuke operators have had to be kept at an extremely short and expensive leash because failure is not an option hence their comparatively outstanding record.
 
I'd like to see more Nuclear and Coal. We have so much coal it would be a pity to not use it.
Im all for the Nuclear, nothing is more clean from any source of 24 hour electricity.

Coal ok but there is that nagging question of how much it can be cleaned up, most coal plants now meet EPA requirements for mercury but even though its greatly reduced I think its still there. I mean there are lakes in every state where you cant eat the fist because they contain it.
The USA also has an abundant supply of natural gas I believe and much cleaner.
(just this mornings thoughts)
 
Hydro power isn't working out so great for China or the SW USA these days.
Wind and solar failed us Texans in Feb 2021
Ukraine is fixin to have a nuke power plant blown of the map

Do the math
 
Come up with an inexpensive, effective, easy way to separate hydrogen AND compress it, and sure, it will work.

Inexpensive, effective, easy

choose one as you won’t get all 3
assuming cheap is $9/gallon equivalent is cheap .

The laws of Physics prevent hydrogen from making sense.

$14,000 15 year high compression tanks by themselves make hydrogen kinda pointless and if you think an EV fire is bad…
 
China is readying its first MSR Thorium reactor, we gave up on it early 70’s

https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Chinese-molten-salt-reactor-cleared-for-start-up

The ultimate in safety and efficiency is coming soon.

Also almost completely solves the waste issue as you get 99% less waste and said waste is much more “potent” making it easier to reuse in passive applications.
You don't need an MSR to use thorium, and you don't need one to eliminate the waste (hence breeder reactors). MSR has its own suite of challenges, mostly related to the molten salt component. Water is much easier to work with (which shouldn't be surprising). The salts can be extremely corrosive and have a significant impact on component longevity and reliability.

None of that means it's not a worthy challenge to pursue, but I do suspect that if China is forthcoming with their experience with this unit, that we'll see some rather significant reliability issues, at least at first.

There's a reason the first SMR constructed in the West will be a scaled-down 10th generation GE BWR.
 
“Hey, you should probably move those back up generators.”

“Lol okay, but we won’t 😉
That wasn't human interference. It was failure to anticipate conditions. Nothing designed by man anticipates what man does not anticipate. When it comes to engineering decisions on matters that have almost zero probability, but vast destruction if the accident occurs, humans often "do not compute". Particularly if making everything totally bullet proof makes the entire project uneconomic.
 
Back
Top Bottom