Originally Posted by emg
Originally Posted by KrisZ
But they have to be implemented in such a way that the driver still remains near 100% attentive.
But that's impossible, because humans are unable to keep 100% of their attention on a task when that task is desperately boring. Like not driving a car.
In an aircraft, that's not always fatal--but often is--because the pilot usually has a few minutes to solve the problem that's just been dumped in his lap. In a car, forget it; if the driver isn't watching the road ahead and doing all the things they normally would when driving, there's no way they're going to react fast enough to prevent it; and, if they have to do all the things they normally would while driving, what's the point?
Sure it can, but then certain functionality, like self steering, should not be allowed at all. Limit the system to emergency braking and a bunch of warning sounds etc. to keep the driver attentive of the task at hand.
But instead all these self driving capabilities are being implemented and tested at the expense of the customer without explaining any of the dangers. Signing a waiver or something similar is not an excuse. If trained professionals such as pilots have trouble staying alert, knowing full well how all the system work, how is all that knowledge all of the sudden being ignored for automotive applications?