Originally Posted By: slacktide_bitog
transverse V6 engines are a nightmare! And sometimes the minivans, SUV's, and crossovers can be even worse! My recommendation would be the Kia Rondo, which was available with a 4-cylinder engine and 7-passenger seating.
The Sienns was also available with a 4-cylinder engine, but only for a few years, and they're relatively new, so out of your budget.
The Transit Connect is also too new to have depreciated to 5k, but you might be able to find one. You might possibly be able to get a Sprinter passenger van within budget.
4s are definitely easier to work on but I wouldn't consider them quite this bad. The chryslers were no harder than working on a V8 shoved into a tight bay, or a midsize v6 RWD SUV such as a nissan pathfinder, or a myriad of other vehicles. It really depends on the exact vehicle itself. Granted, some of the worst arrangements are indeed transverse 6s, especially some of the 90's GM variants, but I think once we reached the 2000s alot of the packaging improved.
transverse V6 engines are a nightmare! And sometimes the minivans, SUV's, and crossovers can be even worse! My recommendation would be the Kia Rondo, which was available with a 4-cylinder engine and 7-passenger seating.
The Sienns was also available with a 4-cylinder engine, but only for a few years, and they're relatively new, so out of your budget.
The Transit Connect is also too new to have depreciated to 5k, but you might be able to find one. You might possibly be able to get a Sprinter passenger van within budget.
4s are definitely easier to work on but I wouldn't consider them quite this bad. The chryslers were no harder than working on a V8 shoved into a tight bay, or a midsize v6 RWD SUV such as a nissan pathfinder, or a myriad of other vehicles. It really depends on the exact vehicle itself. Granted, some of the worst arrangements are indeed transverse 6s, especially some of the 90's GM variants, but I think once we reached the 2000s alot of the packaging improved.