Originally Posted By: Jim Allen
modV8- Interesting info. More desired... specifically info on any published info on the frequency of bypass (if it's public domain) and the Fram references. Would really like to update my knowledge and fill up my files with more stuff. Are there studies available that show how much in the way of contamination is likely to go into the lubrication system during a bypass event? Finally, relating to why the FL820S is "better" is it just because of he bypass location or some other reason?
The Fram reference is from the video that was posted. As for the frequency of oil filter bypass, this information is within SAE/lubrication journals and other cataloged studies located at the SWRI library. I am no longer a research scientist working at SWRI, so I don't have access. I can not provide the charts and citations that the inquisitive minds would want to see. But I do recall simulations performed in the lab that modeled start-up pressure spikes. These almost always lead to the pressure relief valve opening; even with hot oil. By the way, the oil filters and oil samples were almost always coded and packaged in generic containers so their manufacturer/identity were unknown. As for the FL820s, yes I believe it is better primarily because of the bypass valve location. I also believe Ford has put alot thought into a balanced design in terms of flow rate/ efficiency, PRVOP, etc. Ford has invested a large amount of research into engine filtration and has been adamant about the location of the bypass valve.
I wish I could provide you guys more in this area. There are still some publications on the Internet (Google books), that speak about Ford's approach to filtration in years past. Some talk about Ford's view about contaminant sedimentation within oil filters and the need for the threaded-in bypass location.