That is a wild guess on your part with nothing to back it up. At least you admit you have represented one Lucas product as a different product. The CAS numbers are different. The viscosities are wildly different 48 cSt versus 110 cSt. Density is different. The texture is different, the transmission fix is very sticky. It has seal conditioners in it.
Where did I represent it as a different product? I said Lucas with gear lube, I never once stated it was the Trans Fix, I simply suggested that if the test Bob had done with gear oil + Lucas, a combo Lucas recommended, was any indication, there was a significant chance of aeration, something you've not made any effort to disprove.
Maybe the Trans Fix has a splash less VII in it, LOL! Being the equivalent of almost 2x the viscosity of SAE 60, that's a compelling endorsement right there! "Trans Fix, it's like our oil stabilizer, but with less plastic and more tackifier!"
"the transmission fix is very sticky"
Indeed. And why are we putting bar oil tackifier in a product that isn't going in a chainsaw? I'm sure you don't know the answer to that and there likely isn't one beyond the fact that it looks compelling on a parts store counter where it climbs the gears in the little plastic demo machines.
"it has seal conditioners!"
Well stop the train! A product with no formal approvals for anything (unlike MaxLife and Mobil High Mileage) is now claiming to condition seals. Pardon my skepticism that a product blended with the useless inclusion of bar oil tackifier might not be all that it advertises to be in this department when compared to more legitimate offerings.
I'd originally included some queries about shilling for Lucas, a company that's generally maligned on here, but I've removed them in an effort to keep this reasonably civil.