MolaKule
Staff member
Originally Posted By: CCI
Any thoughts on this?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-e...s-idUSKBN1FE1KA
Seems like there is some case to be made for the notion that ethanol has always been primarily a farm subsidy in disguise and a way to keep arable land in agriculture.
Keeping arable land in agriculture could certainly be viewed as legitimate policy in the national interest, but I've always suspected that we'd be better off without the bio-fuel, diesel or gas.
Is it Industry or the purchasing Public that is resistant?
Any thoughts on this?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-e...s-idUSKBN1FE1KA
Seems like there is some case to be made for the notion that ethanol has always been primarily a farm subsidy in disguise and a way to keep arable land in agriculture.
Keeping arable land in agriculture could certainly be viewed as legitimate policy in the national interest, but I've always suspected that we'd be better off without the bio-fuel, diesel or gas.
Is it Industry or the purchasing Public that is resistant?