They also took their act to places where it far more difficult to sue someone who fights back. In the United States I suspect that some of these guys are hoping that maybe the police or a victim does something in retaliation that is lawsuit worthy. But maybe it's just me, but I don't feel remotely bad when any of these clowns get injured doing this stuff.
I guess they're often called "nuisance streamers" although often they use recorded/edited video and not just live streaming. I think one woman is going to prison for defiling food at a supermarket, while another spread some sort of poison on food at a supermarket. And it's apparently at a point where YouTube and TikTok will at least demonetize video, remove them quickly, or even ban them. It's my understanding that a lot are now going to platforms that don't necessarily monetize video content, but where they're relying on donations or subscriptions. I have no idea why anyone would pay for this stuff.
There was one guy who got shot after harassing someone at a mall, and he had already been given a trespass warning. It was really appalling because his parents later defended him, saying he was doing nothing wrong by harassing people for video content.
But yeah - this guy is aching to be sued. He has no First Amendment right to enter someone else's property to be a nuisance or to act as if he's an employee. He was thinking that Raising Cane's was going to sue him a few years ago for a similar stunt. Kind of reminds me of people who have impersonated law enforcement or at least tried to exert some authority. Look up Jeremy DeWitte and Jonathan Becker.
